Re: [RFC] Syntax for fields with both explicit constraints and initializers

[Jose E. Marchesi]

>> I just just add a little thing: if both INITVAL and EXPR are provided,
>> then INITVAL should be checked against EXPR.
>>
>> In other words, this should raise a constraint expression:
>>
>>     int i = QUUX : i in [FOO, BAR, BAZ];
>
> Ya that makes sense to me! Shouldn't be able to set invalid default value.

Well, I like the proposed syntax.

If nobody objects and provides alternatives, I will schedule
implementing it for 2.x :)

Thanks!