[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Added PK_MI_REQ_PRINTV request for MI.

From: Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor
Subject: Re: Added PK_MI_REQ_PRINTV request for MI.
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:59:01 +0430

Hi, Jose.

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 11:01:31PM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> >> Isn't that supposed to be __pkl_mi_value?
> >> How are you testing this btw?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, its supposed to be __pkl_mi_value.
> Ok, with that fixed this is OK for master.
> However, before adding new messages to the MI protocol, we better add a
> suitable test harness.  I think Mohammad has some ideas for that.

I have a Python script to test the MI interactions (which I showed Kostas
a few days ago (over Jitsi)), but due to your excessive love for Python
I don't have any plan to make it upstream :)

I also have a half-written implementation in C (which like the Python script,
runs `poke` MI tests in parallel). I'll send a patch for that when it gets

But meanwhile, I suggest to use that Python script as an "unofficial"
test harness and experimentation platform until I complete the C implementation.
(And to keep you happy, I'll share that script only with Kostas :D) 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]