Re: Added PK_MI_REQ_PRINTV request for MI.

[Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor]

Hi, Jose.

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 11:01:31PM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> 
> >> Isn't that supposed to be __pkl_mi_value?
> >> How are you testing this btw?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, its supposed to be __pkl_mi_value.
> 
> Ok, with that fixed this is OK for master.
> 
> However, before adding new messages to the MI protocol, we better add a
> suitable test harness.  I think Mohammad has some ideas for that.
> 

I have a Python script to test the MI interactions (which I showed Kostas
a few days ago (over Jitsi)), but due to your excessive love for Python
I don't have any plan to make it upstream :)

I also have a half-written implementation in C (which like the Python script,
runs `poke` MI tests in parallel). I'll send a patch for that when it gets
ready.

But meanwhile, I suggest to use that Python script as an "unofficial"
test harness and experimentation platform until I complete the C implementation.
(And to keep you happy, I'll share that script only with Kostas :D) 

WDYT?


Regards,
Mohammad-Reza