Re: MISSING Subcommand

[Jason Stover]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:27:55PM +0800, John Darrington wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's a better way we can implement the /MISSING
> subcommand which appears in nearly all of the stats commands.
> Currently, it's up to each procedure to explicitly implement it, which
> is both a pain and error prone.
> 
> Perhaps we could pass a parameter to the case_reader when its
> constructed so that it returns only the appropriate cases?

This is a good idea. Sometimes procedures need the missing values, but
usually they are dropped. Passing a parameter to the case_reader would
be an easy way to take care of both situations.

-Jason