[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3 |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:22:21 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
From what I recall, this is an internal "version number" of the spss
file format. All modern files will have the value 3, but some older
spss versions (prior to spss v7 ?) will write 2.
In PSPP (and spss?) you can use the /VERSION subcommand to the SAVE
command to control what gets written.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:59:13AM -0500, Pascal Heus wrote:
All:
Does anyone now the exact meaning of the record layout type byte present
in the SPSS .sav file header? This is byte #65 that follows the $FL2
signature and the 60-byte information string. According to the
documentation I found and based on source codes, the only allowed values
are 2=SPSS file and 3=portable file. Problem is that I have recently
received a few files produced I think with SPSS 12 or 13 that have a
layout code = 3 (not sure why) but look exactly like a record layout 2
file. I'm trying to figure out where this difference comes from.
thanks
*P
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Pascal Heus, 2008/03/03
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Ben Pfaff, 2008/03/03
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Pascal Heus, 2008/03/03
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Ben Pfaff, 2008/03/03
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, John Darrington, 2008/03/04
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Ben Pfaff, 2008/03/04
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Ben Pfaff, 2008/03/05
- Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3, Ben Pfaff, 2008/03/08
Re: SPSS file record layout type 2 vs type 3,
John Darrington <=