[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sun, 25 May 2008 21:49:39 -0700
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 07:01:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I also think that this is a good direction to look into, but
> unfortunately I think that the first step we will have to take is
> to get competent legal advice. Witness:
> Both of these are patents titled "A computer method, apparatus
> and storage medium is provided for creating quantitative
> aesthetic graphics from data," inventor L. Wilkinson, assigned to
> SPSS Inc.
> Hmm Yes. Perhaps then it's better if we don't read this book, least
> it subconciously influences the code.
Here's a PhD thesis that I was reading earlier today, which
proposes something related (the Wilkinson book is cited in
related work), but Stolte, the author, at least, claims it is
superior for various reasons:
And here's an earlier paper about the same system, which is much
shorter and therefore easier to read:
My goal in looking this up earlier today was to find a
general-purpose way to describe how to convert data into pivot
tables. The Stolte approach can actually describe both tables
and graphs, which is a bonus over what I was searching for. I am
not sure that the Wilkinson approach can describe tables; I
haven't read it.
I'm going to read the full Stolte paper or thesis when I get a
chance. Thus far, I've barely skimmed it.