Re: value-rep branch ready for review

[John Darrington]

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:00:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
     
     >              * This set of commits almost but not quite eliminates the
     >                concept of "long string" and "short string" variables.
     >                The remaining bits are in the value labels and missing
     >                values code.  To get rid of those, we need to find out
     >                how SPSS 16 (and later) represent value labels for long
     >                string variables in system files.  Does anyone have
     >                some sample system files to examine?
     >
     > I posted some such example some time back as an attachment to bug #20582
     
     Now the distinction is basically gone with the latest set of
     commits.  The files and code that you attached were quite useful,
     too.

Great.  

I think there are a few commits in master which are not in value-rep.
I suggest that we merge master into value-rep, play with value-rep for a
few days, then merge value-rep back into master.

J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature