Re: covariance branch update

[Ben Pfaff]

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:00:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>      
>      I've gone ahead and deleted branches that I know to be obsolete
>      (because they were merged).
>      
>      The mingw branch has not been merged, but it also needs work.
>      I'm working on a revised version.  For now, I deleted the version
>      at savannah, since really it isn't interesting.
>      
>      John, the gtk+-2.16 and thread-aware branches are yours.  I don't
>      know their status.
>
> The gtk+-2.16 branch can certainly be deleted.  The thread-aware branch
> I think is worth keeping at least for a while.

OK.

I deleted the gtk+-2.16 branch.
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org