pspp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Endianess ?


From: Luis Cebamanos
Subject: Re: Endianess ?
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:40:26 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2

If I am not mistaken, in MIPS you can choose the endianess.

On 19/02/2012 19:55, John Darrington wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:42:53AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
     
     > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:42:27PM +0100, bojo42 wrote:
     >      Oops, that celebration was a bit early, as the testsuite failed for
     >      nearly all architectures:
     >
     > I have a feeling that one of our problems may be Endiannes.
     >      
     >      mips:     78 179 180 181 182 183 184 308 439 440 837 922
     >      powerpc: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
     >      s390:    178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
     >      sparc:   178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
     >
     > Would I be right in thinking these are all big-endian architectures?
     
     You're right, those are all big-endian.

I thought so.  I pushed a change which hopefully will fix some of these
issues.  I've no way of actually testing it.

J'



_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]