[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: PSPP - 5-11-2014

From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: Re: PSPP - 5-11-2014
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:37:25 -0800

I only tried the syntax with the demo.sav file from the original report.
I don't know, off-hand, whether address is numeric in that file.

I'd appreciate a backtrace when you have time for it.



On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Harry Thijssen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi
> I could reproduce the problem but only if "address" is numeric.  Did you try
> that?
> I will only be able to produce a backtrace in  the next days.
> Have fun
> 2014-12-01 10:23 GMT+01:00 Harry Thijssen <address@hidden>:
>> >I could not reproduce this problem under GNU/Linux with the latest
>> > version of PSPP. I don't know >what version you are using, but it sounds
>> > like it is from Nov. 5, which is quite recent. If so, then I'll >need some
>> > more information, like a backtrace. If Harry Thijssen is listening--are you
>> > out there >Harry?--then he might be able to reproduce this and get a
>> > backtrace for us.
>> 5-november is indeed a release date of a MSWindows build. I will see this
>> week if I can reproduce the issue
>> Have fun

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]