qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-arm] [PATCH v4 2/3] target-arm: Rename check_s2_startlevel to chec


From: Edgar E. Iglesias
Subject: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v4 2/3] target-arm: Rename check_s2_startlevel to check_s2_mmu_setup
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:16:09 +0100

From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>

Rename check_s2_startlevel to check_s2_mmu_setup in preparation
for additional checks.

Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
---
 target-arm/helper.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
index 5d6f297..13e9933 100644
--- a/target-arm/helper.c
+++ b/target-arm/helper.c
@@ -6763,17 +6763,18 @@ typedef enum {
 } MMUFaultType;
 
 /*
- * check_s2_startlevel
+ * check_s2_mmu_setup
  * @cpu:        ARMCPU
  * @is_aa64:    True if the translation regime is in AArch64 state
  * @startlevel: Suggested starting level
  * @inputsize:  Bitsize of IPAs
  * @stride:     Page-table stride (See the ARM ARM)
  *
- * Returns true if the suggested starting level is OK and false otherwise.
+ * Returns true if the suggested S2 translation parameters are OK and
+ * false otherwise.
  */
-static bool check_s2_startlevel(ARMCPU *cpu, bool is_aa64, int level,
-                                int inputsize, int stride)
+static bool check_s2_mmu_setup(ARMCPU *cpu, bool is_aa64, int level,
+                               int inputsize, int stride)
 {
     const int grainsize = stride + 3;
     int startsizecheck;
@@ -7013,8 +7014,7 @@ static bool get_phys_addr_lpae(CPUARMState *env, 
target_ulong address,
         }
 
         /* Check that the starting level is valid. */
-        ok = check_s2_startlevel(cpu, va_size == 64, level,
-                                 inputsize, stride);
+        ok = check_s2_mmu_setup(cpu, va_size == 64, level, inputsize, stride);
         if (!ok) {
             /* AArch64 reports these as level 0 faults.
              * AArch32 reports these as level 1 faults.
-- 
1.9.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]