[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 00/17] some ARM platform QOM'ify work

From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 00/17] some ARM platform QOM'ify work
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:22:58 +0100

On 7 June 2016 at 11:34, xiaoqiang zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
> This patch series QOM'ify ARM platform related devices.
> Where we drop the sysbus init function if possible and use
> instance_init and DeviceClass::realize function.
> xiaoqiang zhao (17):
>   hw/i2c: QOM'ify bitbang_i2c.c
>   hw/i2c: QOM'ify exynos4210_i2c.c
>   hw/i2c: QOM'ify omap_i2c.c
>   hw/i2c: QOM'ify versatile_i2c.c
>   hw/gpio: QOM'ify mpc8xxx.c
>   hw/gpio: QOM'ify omap_gpio.c
>   hw/gpio: QOM'ify pl061.c
>   hw/gpio: QOM'ify zaurus.c
>   hw/misc: QOM'ify arm_l2x0.c
>   hw/misc: QOM'ify eccmemctl.c
>   hw/misc: QOM'ify exynos4210_pmu.c
>   hw/misc: QOM'ify mst_fpga.c
>   hw/misc: QOM'ify slavio_misc.c
>   hw/dma: QOM'ify pxa2xx_dma.c
>   hw/dma: QOM'ify sparc32_dma.c
>   hw/dma: QOM'ify sun4m_iommu.c
>   hw/sd: QOM'ify pl181.c

This patch series doesn't seem to have been sent threaded
correctly -- it looks like it's three separate threads,
with 0-6 in one, 7-9 in another and 10-17 in a third.
This breaks the automatic tooling for applying patchsets.

Please fix this, and send a fresh series with only the
ARM devices. No sparc, no ppc, so drop patches 5, 10, 13, 15, 16.
You should send separate series with just the PPC devices and
just the SPARC devices, cc'ing the relevant maintainers.

-- PMM

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]