qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm: Fix build on aarch64


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm: Fix build on aarch64
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:43:58 +0100

On 11 October 2016 at 17:32, Christopher Covington <address@hidden> wrote:
> Remove unused debugging code to fix native building on aarch64. Without
> this change, the following -Werr output inhibits make from completing.
>
>   qemu/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c:38:18: error: debug_gic_kvm defined but not used 
> [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>    static const int debug_gic_kvm = 0;
>                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>   qemu/rules.mak:60: recipe for target 'hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.o' failed
>   make[1]: *** [hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.o] Error 1
>   Makefile:205: recipe for target 'subdir-aarch64-softmmu' failed

This builds for me on aarch64, so presumably this is a "newer
compiler is more picky" warning.

> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c | 14 --------------
>  1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> index ae7ac58..11729ee 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> @@ -30,20 +30,6 @@
>  #include "gic_internal.h"
>  #include "vgic_common.h"
>
> -//#define DEBUG_GIC_KVM
> -
> -#ifdef DEBUG_GIC_KVM
> -static const int debug_gic_kvm = 1;
> -#else
> -static const int debug_gic_kvm = 0;
> -#endif
> -
> -#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) do { \
> -        if (debug_gic_kvm) { \
> -            printf("arm_gic: " fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); \
> -        } \
> -    } while (0)
> -
>  #define TYPE_KVM_ARM_GIC "kvm-arm-gic"
>  #define KVM_ARM_GIC(obj) \
>       OBJECT_CHECK(GICState, (obj), TYPE_KVM_ARM_GIC)

In any case, since we don't use the DPRINTF macro we may as well
dump it (we should use tracepoints if we want to add interesting
debug-logging in future anyhow).

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]