Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] target/arm: Correct exclusive store cmpxchg memop mask

[Richard Henderson]

On 08/11/2017 03:17 PM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> When we perform the atomic_cmpxchg operation we want to perform the
> operation on a pair of 32-bit registers. Previously we were just passing
> the register size in which was set to MO_32. This would result in the
> high register to be ignored. To fix this issue we hardcode the size to
> be 64-bits long when operating on 32-bit pairs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> ---
> 
> This was caught with an internal fuzzy tester. These patches fix the
> Xilinx 2.10-rc2 tree. I tested with the fuzzy tester (single CPU) and
> Linux boot (4 CPUs) on the Xilinx tree. I don't have a good test case to
> run on mainline, but am working with some internal teams to get one.
> Also linux-user is fully untested.
> 
> All tests were with MTTCG enabled.
> 
>  target/arm/translate-a64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> index 245175e2f1..49b4d6918d 100644
> --- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> @@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int 
> rd, int rt, int rt2,
>              tcg_gen_concat32_i64(val, cpu_exclusive_val, cpu_exclusive_high);
>              tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_i64(tmp, addr, val, tmp,
>                                         get_mem_index(s),
> -                                       size | MO_ALIGN | s->be_data);
> +                                       MO_64 | MO_ALIGN | s->be_data);
>              tcg_gen_setcond_i64(TCG_COND_NE, tmp, tmp, val);
>              tcg_temp_free_i64(val);
>          } else if (s->be_data == MO_LE) {
> 

Reading the ARM pseudocode again, especially wrt SetExclusiveMonitors, I think
there are other bugs here wrt 32-bit LDXP/STXP.

Since SetExclusiveMonitors is invoked only with address + dsize, one should be
able to write

        ldxp    w0, w1, [x5]
        stxr    w3, x2, [x5]
or
        ldxr    x0, [x5]
        stxp    w3, w1, w2, [x5]

However, the LDXR and LDXP above do not store the cpu_exclusive_* metadata in
the same format.  Fixing this is simply a matter of ignoring cpu_exclusive_high
for 32-bit pair operations and store it all in cpu_exclusive_val, as the 64-bit
single-register operation does.

In addition, 32-bit LDXP must be single-copy atomic, and we're issuing 2 loads,
this is trivially fixed with the rest of the required changes, but perhaps
worth noting.

I'll post a patch shortly.


r~