qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/smmu-common: Fix the name of the iommu


From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/smmu-common: Fix the name of the iommu memory regions
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:16:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0

Hi Peter,

On 9/25/18 4:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 September 2018 at 08:01, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> At the point smmu_find_add_as() gets called, the bus number might
>> not be computed. Let's change the name of IOMMU memory region and
>> just use the devfn and an incrementing index.
>>
>> The name only is used for debug.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> index 55c75d65d2..3f55cfd193 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static AddressSpace *smmu_find_add_as(PCIBus *bus, void 
>> *opaque, int devfn)
>>      SMMUState *s = opaque;
>>      SMMUPciBus *sbus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->smmu_pcibus_by_busptr, bus);
>>      SMMUDevice *sdev;
>> +    static uint index;
> 
> "uint" isn't a standard type (and causes a build failure on
> at least one of my build systems). Did you mean "unsigned int" ?
Hum yes, I did. Shall I repost or do you fix it directly?

Thanks

Eric
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]