[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/smmu-common: Fix the name of the iommu
From: |
Auger Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/smmu-common: Fix the name of the iommu memory regions |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:16:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 |
Hi Peter,
On 9/25/18 4:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 September 2018 at 08:01, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> At the point smmu_find_add_as() gets called, the bus number might
>> not be computed. Let's change the name of IOMMU memory region and
>> just use the devfn and an incrementing index.
>>
>> The name only is used for debug.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> index 55c75d65d2..3f55cfd193 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static AddressSpace *smmu_find_add_as(PCIBus *bus, void
>> *opaque, int devfn)
>> SMMUState *s = opaque;
>> SMMUPciBus *sbus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->smmu_pcibus_by_busptr, bus);
>> SMMUDevice *sdev;
>> + static uint index;
>
> "uint" isn't a standard type (and causes a build failure on
> at least one of my build systems). Did you mean "unsigned int" ?
Hum yes, I did. Shall I repost or do you fix it directly?
Thanks
Eric
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
[Qemu-arm] [PATCH 2/2] hw/arm/smmuv3: fix eventq recording and IRQ triggerring, Eric Auger, 2018/09/21
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 0/2] ARM SMMUv3: Fix event queue handling and memory region names, Peter Maydell, 2018/09/25