qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for missing


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for missing ARM boards
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:19:07 +0000

On 14 November 2018 at 12:00, Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2018-11-14 12:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On 14/11/18 9:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> Add entries for the boards "mcimx6ul-evk", "mcimx7d-sabre", "raspi2",
>>> "raspi3", "sabrelite", "vexpress-a15", "vexpress-a9" and "virt".
>>> While we're at it, also adjust the "i.MX31" section a little bit,
>>> so that the wildcards there do not match anymore for unrelated files
>>> (e.g. the new hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c file).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>   MAINTAINERS | 70
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> [...]
>>> @@ -604,6 +651,12 @@ L: address@hidden
>>>   S: Maintained
>>>   F: hw/*/stellaris*
>>>   +Versatile Express
>>> +M: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>>> +L: address@hidden
>>> +S: Maintained
>>
>> Shouldn't this be 'Supported?'
>> "Someone is actually paid to look after this."
>
> Not sure whether Peter is paid for looking after the
> Versatile Express board??

It's in the same boat as most of these older boards:
I'll review patches and investigate bug reports, but
I'm not actively working on it.

>>> +F: hw/arm/vexpress.c
>>> +
>>>   Versatile PB
>>>   M: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>>>   L: address@hidden
>>> @@ -611,6 +664,13 @@ S: Maintained
>>>   F: hw/*/versatile*
>>>   F: hw/misc/arm_sysctl.c
>>>   +Virt
>>> +M: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>>> +L: address@hidden
>>> +S: Maintained
>>
>> This one is certainly 'Supported'.
>
> Maybe ... Peter could you adjust this when picking up the patch?

I don't list myself as Supported for target/arm either,
so it seems a bit odd to use Supported here...

Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]