qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/16] tests/tcg/mips: fix hello-m


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/16] tests/tcg/mips: fix hello-mips compilation
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 09:31:54 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.1

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Alex,
>
> On 2/28/19 9:25 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> The compilation flags for proper building are in the source tree. We
>> also fix exit to 0 so the result is counted as a success.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  tests/tcg/mips/Makefile.target | 11 ++++-------
>>  tests/tcg/mips/hello-mips.c    |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/mips/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/mips/Makefile.target
>> index 086625f533..1a994d5525 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/mips/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/mips/Makefile.target
>> @@ -8,15 +8,12 @@ MIPS_SRC=$(SRC_PATH)/tests/tcg/mips
>>  # Set search path for all sources
>>  VPATH               += $(MIPS_SRC)
>>
>> +# hello-mips is 32 bit only
>
> Correct.
>
>> +ifeq ($(findstring 64,$(TARGET_NAME)),)
>>  MIPS_TESTS=hello-mips
>>
>>  TESTS += $(MIPS_TESTS)
>>
>> -hello-mips: CFLAGS+=-ffreestanding
>> +hello-mips: CFLAGS+=-mno-abicalls -fno-PIC -mabi=32
>
> As suggested in the header.
>
>>  hello-mips: LDFLAGS+=-nostdlib
>> -
>> -# For MIPS32 and 64 we have a bunch of extra tests in sub-directories
>> -# however they are intended for system tests.
>> -
>> -run-hello-mips: hello-mips
>> -    $(call skip-test, $<, "BROKEN")
>> +endif
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/mips/hello-mips.c b/tests/tcg/mips/hello-mips.c
>> index c7052fdf2e..4e1cf501af 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/mips/hello-mips.c
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/mips/hello-mips.c
>> @@ -60,5 +60,5 @@ static inline int write(int fd, const char *buf, int len)
>>  void __start(void)
>>  {
>>      write (1, "Hello, World!\n", 14);
>> -    exit1 (42);
>
> I understand 42 is to check SYS_exit1 worked, and this is not another
> qemu-user exit. But we were previously never checked the exit code for
> 42. Neither are we checking 'Hello, World' on stdout.

Hmm we could do better but this is pretty much a smoke test anyway.
Either things are so broken it crashes out (which we should detect) or
we exit with a 0 indicating a pass to the calling make.

Once we have a more use cases for non-zero exits we can come up with
some plumbing for checking things.

>
>> +    exit1(0);
>>  }
>>


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]