qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arm: pmu: Test chained counter


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arm: pmu: Test chained counter
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:37:12 +0100

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:25:07PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> Add 2 tests exercising chained counters. The first one uses
> CPU_CYCLES and the second one uses SW_INCR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
> ---
>  arm/pmu.c         | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arm/unittests.cfg |  12 +++++
>  2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> index 1b0101f..538fbeb 100644
> --- a/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void) {}
>  static void test_event_counter_config(void) {}
>  static void test_basic_event_count(void) {}
>  static void test_mem_access(void) {}
> +static void test_chained_counters(void) {}
> +static void test_chained_sw_incr(void) {}
>  
>  #elif defined(__aarch64__)
>  #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
> @@ -458,6 +460,126 @@ static void test_mem_access(void)
>                       read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
>  }
>  
> +static void test_chained_counters(void)
> +{
> +     uint32_t events[] = { 0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */, 0x1E /* CHAIN */};
> +
> +     if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
> +             return;
> +
> +     pmu_reset();
> +
> +     write_regn(pmevtyper, 0, events[0] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> +     write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> +     /* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> +     write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +     /* preset counter #0 at 0xFFFFFFF0 */
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +
> +     precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> +
> +     report(read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) == 1, "CHAIN counter #1 incremented");
> +     report(!read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0), "check no overflow is recorded");
> +
> +     /* test 64b overflow */
> +
> +     pmu_reset();
> +     write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 1, 0x1);
> +     precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> +     report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
> +     report(read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) == 2, "CHAIN counter #1 incremented");
> +     report(!read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0), "check no overflow is recorded");
> +
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 1, 0xFFFFFFFF);
> +
> +     precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> +     report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
> +     report(!read_regn(pmevcntr, 1), "CHAIN counter #1 wrapped");
> +     report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x2,
> +             "check no overflow is recorded");
> +}
> +
> +static void test_chained_sw_incr(void)
> +{
> +     uint32_t events[] = { 0x0 /* SW_INCR */, 0x0 /* SW_INCR */};
> +     int i;
> +
> +     if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
> +             return;
> +
> +     pmu_reset();
> +
> +     write_regn(pmevtyper, 0, events[0] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> +     write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> +     /* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> +     write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +
> +     /* preset counter #0 at 0xFFFFFFF0 */
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> +             write_sysreg(0x1, pmswinc_el0);
> +
> +     report_info("SW_INCR counter #0 has value %ld", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
> +     report(read_regn(pmevcntr, 0) == 0xFFFFFFF0,
> +             "PWSYNC does not increment if PMCR.E is unset");
> +
> +     pmu_reset();
> +
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +     write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +     set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> +             write_sysreg(0x3, pmswinc_el0);
> +
> +     report(read_regn(pmevcntr, 0)  == 84, "counter #1 after + 100 SW_INCR");
> +     report(read_regn(pmevcntr, 1)  == 100,
> +             "counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR");
> +     report_info("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=%ld #1=%ld",
> +                 read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
> +     report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
> +             "overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR");
> +
> +     /* 64b SW_INCR */
> +     pmu_reset();
> +
> +     events[1] = 0x1E /* CHAIN */;
> +     write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +     write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +     set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> +     for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> +             write_sysreg(0x3, pmswinc_el0);
> +
> +     report(!read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) && (read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) == 1),
> +             "overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
> +     report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
> +                 read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
> +
> +     /* 64b SW_INCR and overflow on CHAIN counter*/
> +     pmu_reset();
> +
> +     write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
> +     write_regn(pmevcntr, 1, 0xFFFFFFFF);
> +     write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +     set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> +     for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> +             write_sysreg(0x3, pmswinc_el0);
> +
> +     report((read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x2) &&
> +             (read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) == 0) &&
> +             (read_regn(pmevcntr, 0) == 84),
> +             "overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
> +     report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
> +                 read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
> +}
> +
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> @@ -657,6 +779,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>       } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "mem-access") == 0) {
>               report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>               test_mem_access();
> +     } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "chained-counters") == 0) {
> +             report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> +             test_chained_counters();
> +     } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "chained-sw-incr") == 0) {
> +             report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> +             test_chained_sw_incr();
>       } else {
>               report_abort("Unknown sub-test '%s'", argv[1]);
>       }
> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> index 7a59403..1bd4319 100644
> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> @@ -90,6 +90,18 @@ groups = pmu
>  arch = arm64
>  extra_params = -append 'mem-access'
>  
> +[pmu-chained-counters]
> +file = pmu.flat
> +groups = pmu
> +arch = arm64
> +extra_params = -append 'chained-counters'
> +
> +[pmu-chained-sw-incr]
> +file = pmu.flat
> +groups = pmu
> +arch = arm64
> +extra_params = -append 'chained-sw-incr'
> +
>  # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1
>  #[pmu-tcg-icount-1]
>  #file = pmu.flat
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> 

Same comments as previous patch

Thanks,
drew




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]