[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models
From: |
Havard Skinnemoen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:13:04 -0700 |
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:31 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Havard,
>
> On 7/7/20 8:47 PM, Havard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > The Nuvoton NPCM7xx SoC family are used to implement Baseboard
> > Management Controllers in servers. While the family includes four SoCs,
> > this patch implements limited support for two of them: NPCM730 (targeted
> > for Data Center applications) and NPCM750 (targeted for Enterprise
> > applications).
> >
> > This patch includes little more than the bare minimum needed to boot a
> > Linux kernel built with NPCM7xx support in direct-kernel mode:
> >
> > - Two Cortex-A9 CPU cores with built-in periperhals.
> > - Global Configuration Registers.
> > - Clock Management.
> > - 3 Timer Modules with 5 timers each.
> > - 4 serial ports.
> >
> > The chips themselves have a lot more features, some of which will be
> > added to the model at a later stage.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
> > ---
> > hw/arm/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> > hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h | 81 ++++++++++
>
> Please have a look at the scripts/git.orderfile, using it would
> ease our reviews.
Oh cool.
git config diff.orderFile scripts/git.orderfile
>
> > 3 files changed, 410 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 hw/arm/npcm7xx.c
> > create mode 100644 include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
> > index 534a6a119e..13d163a599 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
> > +++ b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_STM32F205_SOC) += stm32f205_soc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_STM32F405_SOC) += stm32f405_soc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_ZYNQMP_ARM) += xlnx-zynqmp.o xlnx-zcu102.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_VERSAL) += xlnx-versal.o xlnx-versal-virt.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_NPCM7XX) += npcm7xx.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_IMX25) += fsl-imx25.o imx25_pdk.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_IMX31) += fsl-imx31.o kzm.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_IMX6) += fsl-imx6.o
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c b/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..0a9e30f66f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Nuvoton NPCM7xx SoC family.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2020 Google LLC
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> > + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > + * (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> > WITHOUT
> > + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
> > + * for more details.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > +
> > +#include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> > +#include "hw/arm/npcm7xx.h"
> > +#include "hw/char/serial.h"
> > +#include "hw/loader.h"
> > +#include "hw/misc/unimp.h"
> > +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> > +#include "qapi/error.h"
> > +#include "qemu/units.h"
> > +#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> > +
> > +/* The first half of the address space is reserved for DDR4 DRAM. */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_DRAM_BA (0x00000000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_DRAM_SZ (2 * GiB)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This covers the whole MMIO space. We'll use this to catch any MMIO
> > accesses
> > + * that aren't handled by any device.
> > + */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_MMIO_BA (0x80000000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_MMIO_SZ (0x7FFD0000)
> > +
> > +/* Core system modules. */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_L2C_BA (0xF03FC000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_CPUP_BA (0xF03FE000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_GCR_BA (0xF0800000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_CLK_BA (0xF0801000)
> > +
> > +/* Memory blocks at the end of the address space */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_RAM2_BA (0xFFFD0000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_RAM2_SZ (128 * KiB)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_ROM_BA (0xFFFF0000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_ROM_SZ (64 * KiB)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Interrupt lines going into the GIC. This does not include internal
> > Cortex-A9
> > + * interrupts.
> > + */
> > +enum NPCM7xxInterrupt {
> > + NPCM7XX_UART0_IRQ = 2,
> > + NPCM7XX_UART1_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_UART2_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_UART3_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER0_IRQ = 32, /* Timer Module 0 */
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER1_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER2_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER3_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER4_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER5_IRQ, /* Timer Module 1 */
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER6_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER7_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER8_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER9_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER10_IRQ, /* Timer Module 2 */
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER11_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER12_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER13_IRQ,
> > + NPCM7XX_TIMER14_IRQ,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Total number of GIC interrupts, including internal Cortex-A9
> > interrupts. */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_NUM_IRQ (160)
> > +
> > +/* Register base address for each Timer Module */
> > +static const hwaddr npcm7xx_tim_addr[] = {
> > + 0xF0008000,
> > + 0xF0009000,
> > + 0xF000A000,
>
> Here caps hex ...
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Register base address for each 16550 UART */
> > +static const hwaddr npcm7xx_uart_addr[] = {
> > + 0xF0001000,
> > + 0xF0002000,
> > + 0xF0003000,
> > + 0xF0004000,
> > +};
> > +
> > +void npcm7xx_write_secondary_boot(ARMCPU *cpu, const struct arm_boot_info
> > *info)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * The default smpboot stub halts the secondary CPU with a 'wfi'
> > + * instruction, but the arch/arm/mach-npcm/platsmp.c in the Linux
> > kernel
> > + * does not send an IPI to wake it up, so the second CPU fails to
> > boot. So
> > + * we need to provide our own smpboot stub that can not use 'wfi', it
> > has
> > + * to spin the secondary CPU until the first CPU writes to the SCRPAD
> > reg.
> > + */
> > + uint32_t smpboot[] = {
> > + 0xe59f2018, /* ldr r2, bootreg_addr */
> > + 0xe3a00000, /* mov r0, #0 */
> > + 0xe5820000, /* str r0, [r2] */
> > + 0xe320f002, /* wfe */
> > + 0xe5921000, /* ldr r1, [r2] */
> > + 0xe1110001, /* tst r1, r1 */
> > + 0x0afffffb, /* beq <wfe> */
> > + 0xe12fff11, /* bx r1 */
>
> ... here small hex. Pick one style?
Oh wow, I'm being super inconsistent. I'll standardize on small hex throughout.
>
> > + NPCM7XX_SMP_BOOTREG_ADDR,
> > + };
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(smpboot); i++) {
> > + smpboot[i] = tswap32(smpboot[i]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + rom_add_blob_fixed("smpboot", smpboot, sizeof(smpboot),
> > + NPCM7XX_SMP_LOADER_START);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static qemu_irq npcm7xx_irq(NPCM7xxState *s, int n)
> > +{
> > + return qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&s->a9mpcore), n);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void npcm7xx_init(Object *obj)
> > +{
> > + NPCM7xxState *s = NPCM7XX(obj);
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NPCM7XX_MAX_NUM_CPUS; i++) {
> > + object_initialize_child(obj, "cpu[*]", &s->cpu[i],
> > + ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-a9"));
> > + }
> > +
> > + object_initialize_child(obj, "a9mpcore", &s->a9mpcore,
> > TYPE_A9MPCORE_PRIV);
> > + object_initialize_child(obj, "gcr", &s->gcr, TYPE_NPCM7XX_GCR);
> > + object_property_add_alias(obj, "power-on-straps", OBJECT(&s->gcr),
> > + "power-on-straps");
> > + object_initialize_child(obj, "clk", &s->clk, TYPE_NPCM7XX_CLK);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->tim); i++) {
> > + object_initialize_child(obj, "tim[*]", &s->tim[i],
> > TYPE_NPCM7XX_TIMER);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void npcm7xx_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > + NPCM7xxState *s = NPCM7XX(dev);
> > + NPCM7xxClass *nc = NPCM7XX_GET_CLASS(s);
> > + Error *err = NULL;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* I/O space -- unimplemented unless overridden below. */
> > + create_unimplemented_device("npcm7xx.io", NPCM7XX_MMIO_BA,
> > NPCM7XX_MMIO_SZ);
>
> I still insist this is not the best, but as "The data sheet for these
> SoCs is not generally available" there is not much I can suggest to
> improve.
OK, I'll try what you suggested in the next message.
> > +
> > + /* CPUs */
> > + for (i = 0; i < nc->num_cpus; i++) {
> > + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->cpu[i]),
> > + arm_cpu_mp_affinity(i,
> > NPCM7XX_MAX_NUM_CPUS),
> > + "mp-affinity", &error_abort);
> > + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->cpu[i]),
> > NPCM7XX_GIC_CPU_IF_ADDR,
> > + "reset-cbar", &error_abort);
> > + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->cpu[i]), true,
> > + "reset-hivecs", &error_abort);
> > +
> > + /* Disable security extensions. */
> > + if (object_property_find(OBJECT(&s->cpu[i]), "has_el3", NULL)) {
>
> You know these are cortex-a9 right? Why bother checking?
Most other SoCs do, but you're right, might be better to abort if the
CPU isn't what we expect.
>
> > + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->cpu[i]), false, "has_el3",
> > + &error_abort);
> > + }
> > +
> > + qdev_realize(DEVICE(&s->cpu[i]), NULL, &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
>
> Since you don't plan to create a SoC at runtime and hot-plug it, I'd
> simplify by using &error_abort everywhere in this function, and forget
> about propagating.
Is it safe to assume we'll never hot-plug SoCs?
I can't think of a good use case for it, and removing error
propagation will make the code significantly shorter and easier to
follow, so I'll do what you suggest.
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* A9MPCORE peripherals */
> > + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->a9mpcore), nc->num_cpus, "num-cpu",
> > + &error_abort);
>
> See, you already use &error_abort ;)
Right, I generally only propagate errors from realize(), but I guess
that's not necessary either.
> > + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->a9mpcore), NPCM7XX_NUM_IRQ,
> > "num-irq",
> > + &error_abort);
> > + sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->a9mpcore), &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
> > + }
> > + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->a9mpcore), 0, NPCM7XX_CPUP_BA);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nc->num_cpus; i++) {
> > + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->a9mpcore), i,
> > + qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&s->cpu[i]),
> > ARM_CPU_IRQ));
> > + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->a9mpcore), i + nc->num_cpus,
> > + qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&s->cpu[i]),
> > ARM_CPU_FIQ));
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* L2 cache controller */
> > + sysbus_create_simple("l2x0", NPCM7XX_L2C_BA, NULL);
> > +
> > + /* System Global Control Registers (GCR) */
> > + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->gcr), nc->disabled_modules,
> > + "disabled-modules", &error_abort);
> > + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&s->gcr), OBJECT(s->dram), "dram",
> > + &error_abort);
>
> I guess you can simplify using in npcm7xx_init():
>
> object_property_add_const_link(obj, "dram-mr", OBJECT(&s->gcr));
>
> And in npcm7xx_gcr_realize()
>
> obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "dram-mr", &err);
> if (obj == NULL) {
> error_setg(errp, "%s: required dram-mr link not found: %s",
> __func__, error_get_pretty(err));
> return;
> }
> s->dram = MEMORY_REGION(obj);
OK, I'll try that, thanks!
> > + sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->gcr), &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->gcr), 0, NPCM7XX_GCR_BA);
> > +
> > + /* Clock Control Registers (CLK) */
> > + sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->clk), &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->clk), 0, NPCM7XX_CLK_BA);
> > +
> > + /* Timer Modules (TIM) */
> > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_tim_addr) != ARRAY_SIZE(s->tim));
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->tim); i++) {
> > + SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->tim[i]);
> > + int first_irq;
> > + int j;
> > +
> > + sysbus_realize(sbd, &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + sysbus_mmio_map(sbd, 0, npcm7xx_tim_addr[i]);
> > +
> > + first_irq = NPCM7XX_TIMER0_IRQ + i * NPCM7XX_TIMERS_PER_CTRL;
> > + for (j = 0; j < NPCM7XX_TIMERS_PER_CTRL; j++) {
> > + qemu_irq irq = npcm7xx_irq(s, first_irq + j);
> > + sysbus_connect_irq(sbd, j, irq);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* UART0..3 (16550 compatible) */
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_uart_addr); i++) {
> > + serial_mm_init(get_system_memory(), npcm7xx_uart_addr[i], 2,
> > + npcm7xx_irq(s, NPCM7XX_UART0_IRQ + i), 115200,
> > + serial_hd(i), DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* RAM2 (SRAM) */
> > + memory_region_init_ram(&s->sram, OBJECT(dev), "ram2",
> > + NPCM7XX_RAM2_SZ, &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), NPCM7XX_RAM2_BA,
> > &s->sram);
> > +
> > + /* Internal ROM */
> > + memory_region_init_rom(&s->irom, OBJECT(dev), "irom", NPCM7XX_ROM_SZ,
> > &err);
> > + if (err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, err);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), NPCM7XX_ROM_BA,
> > &s->irom);
> > +
> > + /* External DDR4 SDRAM */
> > + memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), NPCM7XX_DRAM_BA,
> > s->dram);
>
> This doesn't look correct, the DRAM is an external component, not
> embedded within the SoC. See the manual ;)
> https://www.nuvoton.com/products/cloud-computing/ibmc/
>
> You should call that in npcm7xx_create_soc() (and eventually rename it)
> or add npcm7xx_create_dram(), maybe cleaner (and call it in each
> mc->init).
OK, will do.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static Property npcm7xx_properties[] = {
> > + DEFINE_PROP_LINK("dram", NPCM7xxState, dram, TYPE_MEMORY_REGION,
> > + MemoryRegion *),
> > + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void npcm7xx_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> > +{
> > + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> > +
> > + dc->realize = npcm7xx_realize;
> > + dc->user_creatable = false;
>
> This confirms you can safely use &error_abort in realize().
Got it.
> > + device_class_set_props(dc, npcm7xx_properties);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void npcm730_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> > +{
> > + NPCM7xxClass *nc = NPCM7XX_CLASS(oc);
> > +
> > + /* NPCM730 is optimized for data center use, so no graphics, etc. */
> > + nc->disabled_modules = 0x00300395;
> > + nc->num_cpus = 2;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void npcm750_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> > +{
> > + NPCM7xxClass *nc = NPCM7XX_CLASS(oc);
> > +
> > + /* NPCM750 has 2 cores and a full set of peripherals */
> > + nc->disabled_modules = 0x00000000;
> > + nc->num_cpus = 2;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const TypeInfo npcm7xx_soc_types[] = {
> > + {
> > + .name = TYPE_NPCM7XX,
> > + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
> > + .instance_size = sizeof(NPCM7xxState),
> > + .instance_init = npcm7xx_init,
> > + .class_size = sizeof(NPCM7xxClass),
> > + .class_init = npcm7xx_class_init,
> > + .abstract = true,
> > + }, {
> > + .name = TYPE_NPCM730,
> > + .parent = TYPE_NPCM7XX,
> > + .class_init = npcm730_class_init,
> > + }, {
> > + .name = TYPE_NPCM750,
> > + .parent = TYPE_NPCM7XX,
> > + .class_init = npcm750_class_init,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +DEFINE_TYPES(npcm7xx_soc_types);
> > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h b/include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..2ffa573b11
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Nuvoton NPCM7xx SoC family.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2020 Google LLC
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> > + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > + * (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> > WITHOUT
> > + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
> > + * for more details.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef NPCM7XX_H
> > +#define NPCM7XX_H
> > +
> > +#include "hw/boards.h"
> > +#include "hw/cpu/a9mpcore.h"
> > +#include "hw/misc/npcm7xx_clk.h"
> > +#include "hw/misc/npcm7xx_gcr.h"
> > +#include "hw/timer/npcm7xx_timer.h"
> > +#include "target/arm/cpu.h"
> > +
> > +#define NPCM7XX_MAX_NUM_CPUS (2)
> > +
> > +/* Magic addresses for setting up direct kernel booting and SMP boot
> > stubs. */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_LOADER_START (0x00000000) /* Start of SDRAM */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_SMP_LOADER_START (0xFFFF0000) /* Boot ROM */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_SMP_BOOTREG_ADDR (0xF080013C) /* GCR.SCRPAD */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_GIC_CPU_IF_ADDR (0xF03FE100) /* GIC within A9 */
> > +
> > +typedef struct NPCM7xxState {
> > + DeviceState parent;
> > +
> > + ARMCPU cpu[NPCM7XX_MAX_NUM_CPUS];
> > + A9MPPrivState a9mpcore;
> > +
> > + MemoryRegion sram;
> > + MemoryRegion irom;
> > + MemoryRegion *dram;
> > +
> > + NPCM7xxGCRState gcr;
> > + NPCM7xxCLKState clk;
> > + NPCM7xxTimerCtrlState tim[3];
> > +} NPCM7xxState;
> > +
> > +#define TYPE_NPCM7XX "npcm7xx"
> > +#define NPCM7XX(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(NPCM7xxState, (obj), TYPE_NPCM7XX)
> > +
> > +#define TYPE_NPCM730 "npcm730"
> > +#define TYPE_NPCM750 "npcm750"
> > +
> > +typedef struct NPCM7xxClass {
> > + DeviceClass parent;
>
> Similar comment that elsewhere on this series, if NPCM7xxClass not used
> outside of npcm7xx.c, keep it local.
OK, will do.
>
> Very good patch, I wanted to R-b it but the DRAM part makes me think
> it might be worth a v5...
Sure, I'll do a v5. Thanks a lot for reviewing!
Havard
- Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] npcm7xx: Add config symbol, (continued)
[PATCH v4 02/12] hw/misc: Add NPCM7xx System Global Control Registers device model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
[PATCH v4 03/12] hw/misc: Add NPCM7xx Clock Controller device model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
[PATCH v4 04/12] hw/timer: Add NPCM7xx Timer device model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
[PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models,
Havard Skinnemoen <=
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/08
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/08
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/07/09
Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] hw/arm: Add NPCM730 and NPCM750 SoC models, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/09
[PATCH v4 06/12] hw/arm: Add two NPCM7xx-based machines, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
[PATCH v4 07/12] hw/arm: Load -bios image as a boot ROM for npcm7xx, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
[PATCH v4 08/12] hw/nvram: NPCM7xx OTP device model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07
[PATCH v4 09/12] hw/mem: Stubbed out NPCM7xx Memory Controller model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/07/07