[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests/acceptance: Test ast2400 and ast2500 machines
|
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests/acceptance: Test ast2400 and ast2500 machines |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:29:19 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 |
On 3/3/21 12:19 PM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 10:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/3/21 2:22 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
>>> Test MTD images from the OpenBMC project on AST2400 and AST2500 SoCs
>>> from ASPEED, by booting Palmetto and Romulus BMC machines.
>>>
>>> The images are fetched from OpenBMC's release directory on github.
>>
>> You need to justify here why this is safe to run that
>> on anyone workstation, or use AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE.
>
> I don't completely understand. What circumstances would it be unsafe
> to run a qemu guest, aside from a bug in qemu itself?
See Alex's rationale here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg774096.html
Point taken, this should be better documented.