qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 04/82] target/arm: Implement SVE2 integer unary operations


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/82] target/arm: Implement SVE2 integer unary operations (predicated)
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:22:54 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1

On 5/11/21 3:10 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 21:30, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v2: Fix sqabs, sqneg (laurent desnogues)
---
  target/arm/helper-sve.h    | 13 +++++++++++
  target/arm/sve.decode      |  7 ++++++
  target/arm/sve_helper.c    | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----
  target/arm/translate-sve.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c
index 42fe315485..bbab84e81d 100644
--- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c
@@ -535,8 +535,8 @@ static inline uint64_t do_sadalp_d(uint64_t n, uint64_t m)
      return m + n1 + n2;
  }

-DO_ZPZZ(sve2_sadalp_zpzz_h, int16_t, H1_2, do_sadalp_h)
-DO_ZPZZ(sve2_sadalp_zpzz_s, int32_t, H1_4, do_sadalp_s)
+DO_ZPZZ(sve2_sadalp_zpzz_h, uint16_t, H1_2, do_sadalp_h)
+DO_ZPZZ(sve2_sadalp_zpzz_s, uint32_t, H1_4, do_sadalp_s)
  DO_ZPZZ_D(sve2_sadalp_zpzz_d, uint64_t, do_sadalp_d)

  static inline uint16_t do_uadalp_h(uint16_t n, uint16_t m)
@@ -557,8 +557,8 @@ static inline uint64_t do_uadalp_d(uint64_t n, uint64_t m)
      return m + n1 + n2;
  }

-DO_ZPZZ(sve2_uadalp_zpzz_h, int16_t, H1_2, do_uadalp_h)
-DO_ZPZZ(sve2_uadalp_zpzz_s, int32_t, H1_4, do_uadalp_s)
+DO_ZPZZ(sve2_uadalp_zpzz_h, uint16_t, H1_2, do_uadalp_h)
+DO_ZPZZ(sve2_uadalp_zpzz_s, uint32_t, H1_4, do_uadalp_s)
  DO_ZPZZ_D(sve2_uadalp_zpzz_d, uint64_t, do_uadalp_d)

  #undef DO_ZPZZ

These two hunks seem like they should have been in the previous patch.

(Why do we want to use uint* for the sadalp version?)

We shouldn't.  Looks like a rebase error?


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]