[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] docs/system/arm: Document which architecture extensions we e
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] docs/system/arm: Document which architecture extensions we emulate |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:19:40 +0100 |
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 17:29, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > These days the Arm architecture has a wide range of fine-grained
> > optional extra architectural features. We implement quite a lot
> > of these but by no means all of them. Document what we do implement,
> > so that users can find out without having to dig through back-issues
> > of our Changelog on the wiki.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > The FEAT_ lists are in the order the features are listed in
> > the Arm ARM; alternatively we could alphabetize them?
>
> Maybe a slight preference for alphabetical order. And crossed fingers
> the ARM ARM doesn't change it's names again ;-)
Yeah, I guess alpha-order is better: that way we have a
reasonable chance at being consistent or at least fixing
our mistakes when we add new entries to the list.
Also, I just realized I missed
- The Scalable Vector Extension v2 (SVE2)
off the list...
-- PMM