qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] hw/arm/virt: Consider SMP configuration in CPU topolo


From: Gavin Shan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] hw/arm/virt: Consider SMP configuration in CPU topology
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:13:08 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0

Hi Jonathan,

On 4/14/22 5:33 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:35:41 +0800
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:49 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 10:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/14/22 10:27 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/14 8:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 4/13/22 8:39 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2022/4/3 22:59, Gavin Shan wrote:

[...]

Oh, after further testing this patch breaks numa-test for aarch64,
which should be checked and fixed. I guess it's because we have
more IDs supported for ARM. We have to fully running the QEMU
tests before sending some patches to ensure that they are not
breaking anything. :)

Thanks for catching the failure and reporting back. I'm not
too much familar with QEMU's test workframe. Could you please
share the detailed commands to reproduce the failure? I will
fix in v6, which will be done in a separate patch :)
There is a reference link: https://wiki.qemu.org/Testing
To catch the failure of this patch: "make check" will be enough.

Speaking from experience, best bet is also upload to a gitlab repo
and let the CI hit things. It will catch this plus any weirdness
elsewhere without you having to figure out too much unless you see
a failure.

The CI is pretty good though more tests always needed!


Thanks a lot for the hint. I usually use github to host my code.
I will setup gitlab repositories so that the verification and
tests can be automated. Not sure if there is any document on
how to trigger the automatic verification and testing from
gitlab?

[...]

Thanks,
Gavin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]