[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH V5] block/nfs: add support for setting debug lev
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH V5] block/nfs: add support for setting debug level
Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:25:02 +0800
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:52:49AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 13.11.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:09:33AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> recent libnfs versions support logging debug messages. Add
> >> support for it in qemu through an URL parameter.
> >> Example:
> >> qemu -cdrom nfs://127.0.0.1/iso/my.iso?debug=2
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> v4->v5: add a comment in the code why we limit the debug level [Stefan]
> >> v3->v4: revert to the initial version, but limit max debug level
> >> v2->v3: use a per-drive option instead of a global one. [Stefan]
> >> v1->v2: reworked patch to accept the debug level as a cmdline
> >> parameter instead of an URI parameter [Stefan]
> >> block/nfs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > Hi Peter,
> > Please use my official maintainer email address <address@hidden>
> > when CCing me. I didn't spot the mail to GMail until after the QEMU 2.5
> > hard freeze deadline.
> Okay. I think I used that email because you replayed to earlier versions
> of this Patch from your Gmail address.
> > Only bug fixes are being merged for QEMU 2.5 now. I'm sorry that this
> > patch didn't make it. My block-next branch will be opening on Monday
> > and I'll merge this patch there for QEMU 2.6.
> Thats not critical in this case. I think same applies for the ATAPI stuff
> we worked on? There you used also your GMail account. Or can this
> be treated as a bugfix?
The ATAPI patches go through John Snow. It's up to him whether they are
considered a bug fix suitable for 2.5 or too risky.
Description: PGP signature