qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/25] block/dirty-bitmap: add read


From: Sementsov-Ogievskiy Vladimir
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/25] block/dirty-bitmap: add readonly field to BdrvDirtyBitmap
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:23:04 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0



On 01.06.2017 01:58, John Snow wrote:

On 05/19/2017 07:02 PM, John Snow wrote:

On 05/03/2017 08:25 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
It will be needed in following commits for persistent bitmaps.
If bitmap is loaded from read-only storage (and we can't mark it
"in use" in this storage) corresponding BdrvDirtyBitmap should be
read-only.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
  block/dirty-bitmap.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |  3 +++
  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
index 90af37287f..ab6a95cf41 100644
--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ struct BdrvDirtyBitmap {
      int64_t size;               /* Size of the bitmap (Number of sectors) */
      bool disabled;              /* Bitmap is read-only */
      int active_iterators;       /* How many iterators are active */
+    bool readonly;              /* Bitmap is read-only and may be changed only
+                                   by deserialize* functions */
      QLIST_ENTRY(BdrvDirtyBitmap) list;
  };
@@ -436,6 +438,7 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
                             int64_t cur_sector, int64_t nr_sectors)
  {
      assert(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap));
+    assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap));
Doesn't this change the nature of the assertion?

We're going from
     return !(bitmap->disabled || bitmap->successor);
to
        !bitmap->readonly

That makes me a little nervous to ACK this patch, because the
correctness depends on how readonly is updated and manipulated in the
future, which makes it more prone to error.

I must have been *REALLY* tired when I sent this; I had thought you were
replacing an assertion instead of just adding one.

I'm sorry about that.

I thought so,  don't worry)


      hbitmap_set(bitmap->bitmap, cur_sector, nr_sectors);
  }
@@ -443,12 +446,14 @@ void bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
                               int64_t cur_sector, int64_t nr_sectors)
  {
      assert(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap));
+    assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap));
      hbitmap_reset(bitmap->bitmap, cur_sector, nr_sectors);
  }
void bdrv_clear_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, HBitmap **out)
  {
      assert(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap));
+    assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap));
      if (!out) {
          hbitmap_reset_all(bitmap->bitmap);
      } else {
@@ -519,6 +524,7 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
cur_sector,
          if (!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap)) {
              continue;
          }
+        assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap));
          hbitmap_set(bitmap->bitmap, cur_sector, nr_sectors);
      }
  }
@@ -540,3 +546,13 @@ int64_t bdrv_get_meta_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
  {
      return hbitmap_count(bitmap->meta);
  }
+
+bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
+{
+    return bitmap->readonly;
+}
+
+void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_set_readonly(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
+{
+    bitmap->readonly = true;
+}
diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
index 1e17729ac2..0aab5841f5 100644
--- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
+++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
@@ -75,4 +75,7 @@ void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_deserialize_ones(BdrvDirtyBitmap 
*bitmap,
                                          bool finish);
  void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_deserialize_finish(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
+bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
+void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_set_readonly(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
+
  #endif


--
Best regards,
Vladimir.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]