|
From: | Eric Blake |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 8/8] iotests: new test 209 for NBD BLOCK_STATUS |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:50:37 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 03/12/2018 10:21 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden> ---
+ +iotests.verify_image_format(supported_fmts=['qcow2'])
Interesting that './check -nbd' doesn't run 209 (because that defaults to format -raw, but we need format -qcow2), but './check -nbd' and './check -qcow2 -nbd' do run it, so I've tested that it passes, and is quick.
+ +disk, nbd_sock = file_path('disk', 'nbd-sock') +nbd_uri = 'nbd+unix:///exp?socket=' + nbd_sock + +qemu_img_create('-f', iotests.imgfmt, disk, '1M') +qemu_io('-f', iotests.imgfmt, '-c', 'write 0 512K', disk) + +qemu_nbd('-k', nbd_sock, '-x', 'exp', '-f', iotests.imgfmt, disk) +qemu_img_verbose('map', '-f', 'raw', '--output=json', nbd_uri)
And this one is easy enough to reproduce, whether I use shell or python. (Better than some of the python iotests that just have a line of '.....' where you have to scratch your head at how to reproduce failures).
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/group @@ -202,3 +202,4 @@ 203 rw auto 204 rw auto quick 205 rw auto quick +209 rw auto quick
the obvious context conflict as other tests land into master, but I don't mind that ;)
-- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |