[Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 0/7] dirty-bitmap: rewrite bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

Hi all.

1. bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area don't use hbitmap_next_zero and uses
inefficient loop instead. Let's improve it.

2. bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area don't handle unaligned offset and
max_offset correctly. I'm not sure that it is a real bug. But if it is,
we need these series in 3.0.

Details are in 04 commit message.

v2:

01: - improve comment
    - s/bytes/count/
    - fix forgotten function call in test
    - introduce orig_size field here for HBitmap,
      make checking in hbitmap_next_zero more effective and safe
02: new
03: - orig_size already introduced in 01
    - fix hbitmap_next_dirty_area to not return value less than
      offset on unaligned requests

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (7):
  dirty-bitmap: improve bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero
  tests: add tests for hbitmap_next_zero with non-zero count parameter
  dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area
  block/mirror: fix and improve do_sync_target_write
  Revert "block/dirty-bitmap: Add bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area"
  Revert "test-hbitmap: Add non-advancing iter_next tests"
  Revert "hbitmap: Add @advance param to hbitmap_iter_next()"

 include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |  8 +++--
 include/qemu/hbitmap.h       | 30 ++++++++++++++----
 block/backup.c               |  4 +--
 block/dirty-bitmap.c         | 69 +++++++----------------------------------
 block/mirror.c               | 16 +++++-----
 nbd/server.c                 |  2 +-
 tests/test-hbitmap.c         | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 util/hbitmap.c               | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 8 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.1