qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] IDE: deprecate ide-drive


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] IDE: deprecate ide-drive
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:40:23 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

Am 10.10.2019 um 13:54 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 13:42:26 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 10/10/19 1:26 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 13:22:37 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > > On 10/10/19 12:43 AM, John Snow wrote:
> > > > > It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or 
> > > > > ide-hd.
> > > > > I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the 
> > > > > super-object
> > > > > will make that easier.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Either way, we don't need this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Libvirt-checked-by: Peter Krempa <address@hidden>
> > > > 
> > > > Peter made a comment regarding Laszlo's Regression-tested-by tag:
> > > > 
> > > >    [...] nobody else is using
> > > >    this convention (there are exactly 0 instances of
> > > >    "Regression-tested-by" in the project git log as far as
> > > >    I can see), and so in practice people reading the commits
> > > >    won't really know what you meant by it. Everybody else
> > > >    on the project uses "Tested-by" to mean either of the
> > > >    two cases you describe above, without distinction...
> > > > 
> > > > It probably applies to 'Libvirt-checked-by' too.
> > > 
> > > I certainly didn't test it. So feel free to drop that line altogether.
> > 
> > But you reviewed it, can we use your 'Reviewed-by' instead?
> 
> To be honest, I didn't really review the code nor the documentation.
> I actually reviewed only the idea itself in the context of integration
> with libvirt and that's why I didn't go for 'Reviewed-by:'.
> 
> The gist of the citation above is that we should stick to well known
> tags with their well known meanings and I think that considering this a
> 'review' would be a stretch of the definiton.

I think Acked-by works well for instances like this (i.e. you're just
saying that you agree and the intended change is fine from libvirt's
POV, not that you made any effort to check that the patches are correct
or anything).

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]