[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS v
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:14:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
Hi Sam,
On 10/16/19 13:02, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> Gentle Ping,
>
> Philippe, John?
>
> Just wondering if the series is okay, as Gerd pointed out this series
> is a blocker for the corresponding changes in SeaBIOS for v 1.13
The QEMU series is still not merged, due to a bug in the last patch
(namely, the test case, "hd-geo-test: Add tests for lchs override").
To my knowledge, SeaBIOS prefers to merge patches with the underlying
QEMU patches merged first, so you'll likely have to fix that QEMU issue
first.
I explained the bug in the QEMU test case here:
http://mid.mail-archive.com/address@hidden
http://mid.mail-archive.com/address@hidden
(Alternative links to the same:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01790.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01793.html
)
I've never received feedback to those messages, and I think you must
have missed them.
FWIW, when I hit "Reply All" in that thread, you were on the "To:" list
with:
Sam Eiderman <address@hidden>
but here you are present with
Sam Eiderman <address@hidden>
In addition, when I posted those messages, I got the following
auto-response ("Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"):
> This is the mail system at host mx1.redhat.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>
> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
>
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>
> The mail system
>
> <address@hidden>: host
> aserp2030.oracle.com[141.146.126.74] said:
> 550 5.1.1 Unknown recipient address. (in reply to RCPT TO command)
I didn't know your new address, so I could only hope you'd find my
feedback on qemu-devel.
Thanks
Laszlo
- Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/10/08
- Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Sam Eiderman, 2019/10/08
- Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Sam Eiderman, 2019/10/16
- Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values,
Laszlo Ersek <=
- Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/10/16
- Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Sam Eiderman, 2019/10/16
- Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, John Snow, 2019/10/16
- Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Sam Eiderman, 2019/10/16
- Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/10/16