qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Priority of -accel


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: Priority of -accel
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:59:06 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:49:45PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 13 Jan 2020, at 17:25, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > On 13/01/20 17:17, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Perfect opportunity to change the default to something more useful.
> > 
> > I am not sure acutally if it's that more useful, now that we have
> > sanctioned qemu-kvm as the fast alternative.
> 
> OK, half a joke, but we should have tested on “q” at the beginning
> rather than “-kvm” at the end ;-)
> 
> emu being the slow one ;-)

IIRC, Debian had (still has ?) it called /usr/bin/kvm

The qemu-kvm naming came from RHEL / Fedora land originally,
when the project was literally forked as a "qemu-kvm" git repo.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]