[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Priority of -accel
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: Priority of -accel |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:59:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:49:45PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
> > On 13 Jan 2020, at 17:25, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On 13/01/20 17:17, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Perfect opportunity to change the default to something more useful.
> >
> > I am not sure acutally if it's that more useful, now that we have
> > sanctioned qemu-kvm as the fast alternative.
>
> OK, half a joke, but we should have tested on “q” at the beginning
> rather than “-kvm” at the end ;-)
>
> emu being the slow one ;-)
IIRC, Debian had (still has ?) it called /usr/bin/kvm
The qemu-kvm naming came from RHEL / Fedora land originally,
when the project was literally forked as a "qemu-kvm" git repo.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), (continued)
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Thomas Huth, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Christophe de Dinechin, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Peter Maydell, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Kevin Wolf, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/13
- Re: Priority of -accel, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/13
- Re: Priority of -accel, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/14
- Re: Priority of -accel, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/14
- Re: Priority of -accel, Christophe de Dinechin, 2020/01/14
- Re: Priority of -accel,
Daniel P . Berrangé <=