qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Misc hw/ide legacy clean up


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Misc hw/ide legacy clean up
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:45:53 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 13/03/2020 21:14, BALATON Zoltan wrote:

> These are some clean ups to remove more legacy init functions and
> lessen dependence on include/hw/ide.h with some simplifications in
> board code. There should be no functional change.
> 
> BALATON Zoltan (8):
>   hw/ide: Get rid of piix3_init functions
>   hw/ide: Get rid of piix4_init function
>   hw/ide: Remove now unneded #include "hw/pci/pci.h" from hw/ide.h
>   hw/ide: Move MAX_IDE_BUS define to one header
>   hw/ide/pci.c: Coding style update to fix checkpatch errors
>   hw/ide: Do ide_drive_get() within pci_ide_create_devs()
>   hw/ide: Move MAX_IDE_DEVS define to hw/ide/internal.h
>   hw/ide: Remove unneeded inclusion of hw/ide.h
> 
>  hw/alpha/dp264.c              | 15 +++------------
>  hw/hppa/hppa_sys.h            |  1 -
>  hw/hppa/machine.c             |  3 ---
>  hw/i386/pc_piix.c             | 20 +++++++++-----------
>  hw/ide/ahci_internal.h        |  1 +
>  hw/ide/pci.c                  | 10 ++++++----
>  hw/ide/piix.c                 | 31 +------------------------------
>  hw/isa/piix4.c                | 14 +++++---------
>  hw/mips/mips_fulong2e.c       |  6 +-----
>  hw/mips/mips_malta.c          |  6 ++----
>  hw/mips/mips_r4k.c            |  4 +---
>  hw/ppc/mac_newworld.c         |  2 --
>  hw/ppc/mac_oldworld.c         |  2 --
>  hw/ppc/prep.c                 |  3 ---
>  hw/sparc64/sun4u.c            |  7 +------
>  include/hw/ide.h              |  6 ------
>  include/hw/ide/internal.h     |  3 +++
>  include/hw/ide/pci.h          |  3 ++-
>  include/hw/misc/macio/macio.h |  1 +
>  include/hw/southbridge/piix.h |  3 +--
>  20 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)

This looks like a good clean-up to me, but certainly it would be good to get a 
second
opinion from people more familiar with the IDE code internals.

Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]