qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Coverity CID 1421984


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: Coverity CID 1421984
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:46:47 +0000

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 14:43, BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 14:06, BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> Coverity has flagged up a lot of leaks involving qemu_allocate_irqs();
> >>> most of them I've for the moment just set as "insignificant, fix
> >>> required" because they're in called-once functions like board init.
> >>> If this device can't be hot-unplugged and so we will only ever call
> >>> realize once, it would fall in that category too. Otherwise I'd
> >>> suggest conversion to qdev_init_gpio_in(). (This allocates arrays
> >>> of IRQs under the hood too, but the device_finalize() function will
> >>> automatically free them for you, so it's easier to use non-leakily.)
> >>
> >> I think I can't do that in sii3112 becuase I need to pass irq to this func:
> >>
> >> void ide_init2(IDEBus *bus, qemu_irq irq);
> >
> > ide_init2(bus, qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(dev), i);
> >
> > should do what you want, I think.
>
> I don't understand what you mean.

I mean that if you allocate the IRQs with qdev_init_gpio_in()
then the way to get a qemu_irq from within them to pass
to another function is to call qdev_get_gpio_in(). So you
just want to make your call to ide_init2() be the line I
suggest above.

> Sent a patch that I think might fix this
> warning for now. I'd leave qdevifying ide code to someone else.

There's no need to qdevify IDE for this.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]