[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] iotests: use python logging
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] iotests: use python logging |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:00:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
On 25.03.20 00:20, John Snow wrote:
> This series uses python logging to enable output conditionally on
> iotests.log(). We unify an initialization call (which also enables
> debugging output for those tests with -d) and then make the switch
> inside of iotests.
>
> It will help alleviate the need to create logged/unlogged versions
> of all the various helpers we have made.
>
> Also, I got lost and accidentally delinted iotests while I was here.
> Sorry about that. By version 9, it's now the overwhelming focus of
> this series. No good deed, etc.
Generally, test patches are fair game for the freeze period. However,
this series is quite extensive, so I might prefer block-next here.
OTOH, if I do take it to block-next, patch 11 might grow stale.
Do you have a strong opinion either way?
Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH v9 10/14] iotests: add hmp helper with logging, (continued)
- [PATCH v9 13/14] iotests: Mark verify functions as private, John Snow, 2020/03/24
- [PATCH v9 11/14] iotests: add script_initialize, John Snow, 2020/03/24
- [PATCH v9 14/14] iotests: use python logging for iotests.log(), John Snow, 2020/03/24
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] iotests: use python logging,
Max Reitz <=
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] iotests: use python logging, John Snow, 2020/03/30