Re: [PATCH 6/6] qga/commands-posix: fix use after free of local_err

[Markus Armbruster]

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden> writes:

[...]
> I agree that this is a strange function and its logic is weird. But I
> don't know what the logic should be. My patch is still valid to just
> fix obvious use-after-free and possible leak. It doesn't fix the
> logic.

I sketched improved logic elsewhere in this thread, and I can turn that
into a patch.

I can either make it replace Vladimir's patch, or make it go on top.  If
the latter, we can apply just Vladimir's patch for 5.0, and punt mine to
5.1

Got a preference?