[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] iotests: Fix 051 output after qdev_init_nofail() re
|
From: |
Max Reitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] iotests: Fix 051 output after qdev_init_nofail() removal |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:12:50 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
On 03.07.20 12:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 03.07.20 10:07, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 24.06.2020 um 16:04 hat Alex Bennée geschrieben:
>>>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Commit 96927c744 replaced qdev_init_nofail() call by
>>>> isa_realize_and_unref() which has a different error
>>>> message. Update the test output accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Gitlab CI error after merging b77b5b3dc7:
>>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/597414772#L4375
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> Message-Id: <20200616154949.6586-1-philmd@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied (this individual patch) to the block branch.
>>
>> Hm, I’ve already included it in my pull request from last week:
>>
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2020-06/msg01159.html
>>
>> Unfortunately, the request got no response so far.
>
> I think Peter's been on holiday this week so I guess there will be a
> pile of PRs to process next week.
It looked to me like he responded to some pull requests this week, so,
well... I don’t know.