qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] block: deprecate the sheepdog driver


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] block: deprecate the sheepdog driver
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:52:54 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.2

22.09.2020 21:11, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:43 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:09:06PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

2 years back I proposed dropping the sheepdog mailing list from the
MAINTAINERS file, but somehow the patch never got picked up:

   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2018-03/msg01048.html

So here I am with the same patch again.

This time I go further and deprecate the sheepdog driver entirely.
See the rationale in the second patch commit message.

Daniel P. Berrangé (2):
   block: drop moderated sheepdog mailing list from MAINTAINERS file
   block: deprecate the sheepdog block driver

  MAINTAINERS                |  1 -
  block/sheepdog.c           | 15 +++++++++++++++
  configure                  |  5 +++--
  docs/system/deprecated.rst |  9 +++++++++
  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--
2.26.2



I don't know of anyone shipping this other than Fedora, and I
certainly don't use it there.

Upstream looks like it's unmaintained now, with no commits in over two
years: https://github.com/sheepdog/sheepdog/commits/master

Can we also get a corresponding change to eliminate this from libvirt?

This is only deprecation in QEMU, the feature still exists and is
intended to be as fully functional as in previous releases.

Assuming QEMU actually deletes the feature at end of the deprecation
cycle, then libvirt would look at removing its own support.


Does that stop us from deprecating it in libvirt though?


I think not. Libvirt is not intended to support all Qemu features and
I'm sure it doesn't. Amd it can safely deprecate features even if they
are not-deprecated in Qemu.

The only possible conflict is when Qemu wants to deprecate something
that Libvirt wants to continue support for (or even can't live without).

--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]