qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] docs: Better mention of qemu-img amend limitations


From: Nir Soffer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Better mention of qemu-img amend limitations
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:56:38 +0300

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:38 PM Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Missed during merge resolution of commit bc5ee6da71.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/tools/qemu-img.rst | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/tools/qemu-img.rst b/docs/tools/qemu-img.rst
> index c35bd6482203..2b5891b54db7 100644
> --- a/docs/tools/qemu-img.rst
> +++ b/docs/tools/qemu-img.rst
> @@ -265,6 +265,10 @@ Command description:
>    --force allows some unsafe operations. Currently for -f luks, it allows to
>    erase the last encryption key, and to overwrite an active encryption key.
>
> +  The set of options that can be amended are dependent on the image
> +  format, but note that amending the backing chain relationship should
> +  instead be performed with ``qemu-img rebase``.

Because of the backing format?

> +
>  .. option:: bench [-c COUNT] [-d DEPTH] [-f FMT] 
> [--flush-interval=FLUSH_INTERVAL] [-i AIO] [-n] [--no-drain] [-o OFFSET] 
> [--pattern=PATTERN] [-q] [-s BUFFER_SIZE] [-S STEP_SIZE] [-t CACHE] [-w] [-U] 
> FILENAME
>
>    Run a simple sequential I/O benchmark on the specified image. If ``-w`` is
> --
> 2.28.0
>
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]