qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 22/23] hw/sd: Fix incorrect populated function switch status d


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PULL 22/23] hw/sd: Fix incorrect populated function switch status data structure
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:16:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1

Hi Bin,

On 8/21/20 7:29 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>

At present the function switch status data structure bit [399:376]
are wrongly pupulated. These 3 bytes encode function switch status
for the 6 function groups, with 4 bits per group, starting from
function group 6 at bit 399, then followed by function group 5 at
bit 395, and so on.

However the codes mistakenly fills in the function group 1 status
at bit 399. This fixes the code logic.

Fixes: a1bb27b1e9 ("SD card emulation (initial implementation)")
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Tested-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com>
Message-Id: <1598021136-49525-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
  hw/sd/sd.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
index 7c9d956f113..805e21fc883 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
@@ -807,11 +807,12 @@ static void sd_function_switch(SDState *sd, uint32_t arg)
      sd->data[11] = 0x43;
      sd->data[12] = 0x80;   /* Supported group 1 functions */
      sd->data[13] = 0x03;
+
      for (i = 0; i < 6; i ++) {
          new_func = (arg >> (i * 4)) & 0x0f;
          if (mode && new_func != 0x0f)
              sd->function_group[i] = new_func;
-        sd->data[14 + (i >> 1)] = new_func << ((i * 4) & 4);
+        sd->data[16 - (i >> 1)] |= new_func << ((i % 2) * 4);

This patch broke the orangepi machine, reproducible running
test_arm_orangepi_bionic:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg739449.html

Can you have a look?

      }
      memset(&sd->data[17], 0, 47);
      stw_be_p(sd->data + 64, sd_crc16(sd->data, 64));




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]