[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Rework iotests/check
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Rework iotests/check |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:27:45 +0100 |
Am 20.01.2021 um 21:52 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 1/16/21 7:44 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > These series has 3 goals:
> >
> > - get rid of group file (to forget about rebase and in-list conflicts)
> > - introduce human-readable names for tests
> > - rewrite check into python
> >
> > v7:
> > - fix wording and grammar
> > - satisfy python linters
> > - move argv interfaces all into one in new check script
> > - support '-n' == '--dry-run' option
> > - update check-block to run check with correct PYTHON
>
> I'd really like a second reviewer on 7-11, but I'm queueing 1-6 on my
> NBD tree now.
Oh, you already sent a pull request? Having 6 in without the rest is not
a good state. We now have the group info duplicated and one of them is
ignored, but will become the meaningful copy later. We need to be
careful to not let them diverge now.
I hope the rest is fine so we can switch over quickly, otherwise I'd
prefer to revert 6 and redo it from the then current state when we merge
the whole series.
Kevin
- Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] iotests: add testrunner.py, (continued)
[PATCH v7 06/11] iotests: define group in each iotest, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2021/01/16
Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Rework iotests/check, Eric Blake, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Rework iotests/check,
Kevin Wolf <=
Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Rework iotests/check, Paolo Bonzini, 2021/01/21
Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Rework iotests/check, Kevin Wolf, 2021/01/22