qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 06/23] hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk: Avoid dynamic stack all


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/23] hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk: Avoid dynamic stack allocation
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 17:19:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1

On 5/6/21 4:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 11:01:47AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 5/6/21 10:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:10:30PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Use autofree heap allocation instead of variable-length
>>>> array on the stack.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 7 ++++---
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> The motivation behind removing all variable-length allocations
>> (and adding CPPFLAG+=-Wvla at the end) is to avoid security
>> vulnerabilities such CVE-2021-3527.
> 
> I see. Please mention it in the commit description. There could be other
> reasons for this change, like minimizing stack usage, so I wasn't sure
> why.

Fair enough.

>>> This is a performance-critical code path and BITS_TO_LONGS(nvqs) is
>>> small.
>>
>> OK, having looked better at nvqs, I suppose this is preferred:
>>
>> -- >8 --
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static void notify_guest_bh(void *opaque)
>>  {
>>      VirtIOBlockDataPlane *s = opaque;
>>      unsigned nvqs = s->conf->num_queues;
>> -    unsigned long bitmap[BITS_TO_LONGS(nvqs)];
>> +    unsigned long bitmap[BITS_TO_LONGS(VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX)];
>>      unsigned j;
>>
>>      memcpy(bitmap, s->batch_notify_vqs, sizeof(bitmap));
>> ---
>>
>> Would that work for you?
> 
> It's a little risky since s->batch_notify_vqs does not have
> sizeof(bitmap). That makes uninitialized data and buffer overflows more
> likely. Your example has the bug:
> 
>   memcpy(bitmap, s->batch_notify_vqs, sizeof(bitmap));
>                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   Accesses beyond the end of s->batch_notify_vqs[].

Doh I missed that :/

> Can we eliminate bitmap[] entirely by using bitops.h APIs on
> s->batch_notify_vqs instead?

You meant the bitmap.h API I assume, OK, better idea!

Thanks,

Phil.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]