qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] hw/sd: Allow card size not power of 2 again


From: Alexander Bulekov
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] hw/sd: Allow card size not power of 2 again
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 00:04:08 -0400

On 210624 1012, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/24/21 4:50 AM, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> > On 210623 2000, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Hi Ubi-Wan Kenubi and Tom,
> >>
> >> In commit a9bcedd (SD card size has to be power of 2) we decided
> >> to restrict SD card size to avoid security problems (CVE-2020-13253)
> >> but this became not practical to some users.
> >>
> >> This RFC series tries to remove the limitation, keeping our
> >> functional tests working. It is unfinished work because I had to
> >> attend other topics, but sending it early as RFC to get feedback.
> >> I'll keep working when I get more time, except if one if you can
> >> help me.
> >>
> >> Alexander, could you generate a qtest reproducer with the fuzzer
> >> corpus? See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1878054
> > 
> > I think that bug was already fixed - the reproducer no logner causes a
> > timeout on 6.0. Did I misunderstand something?
> 
> That bug was fixed but now I'm changing the code and would like to feel
> sure I'm not re-introducing the problem, so having the reproducer in the
> tree would help.

Ok - I'll try to come up with one. Minimizing reproducers for timeouts
is trickier than crashes :-)

> 
> > I applied this series and ran the OSS-Fuzz corpus for the sdhci-v3
> > config. The only problem it found is this assert() (that exists without the
> > patch anyways):
> > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29225 
> 
> Sigh.
> 
> > Let me know if this is something you think I should report on gitlab..
> 
> Yes please :(

Ok here it is: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/450

The fuzzer I left running for 24h also found another bug (looks like DMA
reentrancy), which I thought was introduced by this patchset, since
OSS-Fuzz had not reported it in months of fuzzing. However, as a
sanity-check I tried it against qemu.git and it crashed - strange...
Anyways here it is: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/451

-Alex

> 
> > I'll leave the fuzzer running for another 24h or so, but otherwise I'm
> > happy to leave a Tested-by, once there is a V1 series 
> > -Alex
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]