qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] migration: multifd: Enable zerocopy


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] migration: multifd: Enable zerocopy
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:29:09 -0400

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 02:16:42PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 08:02:39AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > Call qio_channel_set_zerocopy(true) in the start of every multifd thread.
> > 
> > Change the send_write() interface of multifd, allowing it to pass down
> > flags for qio_channel_write*().
> > 
> > Pass down MSG_ZEROCOPY flag for sending memory pages, while keeping the
> > other data being sent at the default copying approach.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  migration/multifd-zlib.c | 7 ++++---
> >  migration/multifd-zstd.c | 7 ++++---
> >  migration/multifd.c      | 9 ++++++---
> >  migration/multifd.h      | 3 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> > @@ -675,7 +676,8 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque)
> >              }
> >  
> >              if (used) {
> > -                ret = multifd_send_state->ops->send_write(p, used, 
> > &local_err);
> > +                ret = multifd_send_state->ops->send_write(p, used, 
> > MSG_ZEROCOPY,
> > +                                                          &local_err);
> 
> I don't think it is valid to unconditionally enable this feature due to the
> resource usage implications
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4/networking/msg_zerocopy.html
> 
>   "A zerocopy failure will return -1 with errno ENOBUFS. This happens 
>    if the socket option was not set, the socket exceeds its optmem 
>    limit or the user exceeds its ulimit on locked pages."
> 
> The limit on locked pages is something that looks very likely to be
> exceeded unless you happen to be running a QEMU config that already
> implies locked memory (eg PCI assignment)

Yes it would be great to be a migration capability in parallel to multifd. At
initial phase if it's easy to be implemented on multi-fd only, we can add a
dependency between the caps.  In the future we can remove that dependency when
the code is ready to go without multifd.  Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]