qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] nbd/server: Add --selinux-label option


From: Richard W.M. Jones
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nbd/server: Add --selinux-label option
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:37:27 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:00:11PM -0300, Willian Rampazzo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 5:55 AM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> >
> > 9/30/21 11:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Under SELinux, Unix domain sockets have two labels.  One is on the
> > > disk and can be set with commands such as chcon(1).  There is a
> > > different label stored in memory (called the process label).  This can
> > > only be set by the process creating the socket.  When using SELinux +
> > > SVirt and wanting qemu to be able to connect to a qemu-nbd instance,
> > > you must set both labels correctly first.
> > >
> > > For qemu-nbd the options to set the second label are awkward.  You can
> > > create the socket in a wrapper program and then exec into qemu-nbd.
> > > Or you could try something with LD_PRELOAD.
> > >
> > > This commit adds the ability to set the label straightforwardly on the
> > > command line, via the new --selinux-label flag.  (The name of the flag
> > > is the same as the equivalent nbdkit option.)
> > >
> > > A worked example showing how to use the new option can be found in
> > > this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984938
> > >
> > > Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984938
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> >
> > this should be Reviewed-by?
> 
> Maybe, because of this:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-09/msg07081.html
> 
> I got confused with this v3.

Yes, I'd somehow lost the original patch and picked it up from Eric's
queue to make v3.

Having said that I'm not sure what the objection above means.  Do you
mean Eric's tag should be Reviewed-by instead of S-o-b?  (And why?)

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]