Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?

[Markus Armbruster]

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>> 
>>> Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ?
>> Short answer: hell, no!  ;)
>
> Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get()
> to avoid such mistakes in the future?

Worth a try.