[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC v3 2/5] qemu-io: add zoned block device operations.
From: |
Sam Li |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC v3 2/5] qemu-io: add zoned block device operations. |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:31:20 +0800 |
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> 于2022年6月27日周一 15:30写道:
>
> On 6/27/22 02:19, Sam Li wrote:
> > ---
>
> Good coding style would advise to add some text here what the patch does.
>
> > block/io.c | 21 +++++++
> > include/block/block-io.h | 13 +++++
> > qemu-io-cmds.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> > index 789e6373d5..656a1b7271 100644
> > --- a/block/io.c
> > +++ b/block/io.c
> > @@ -3258,6 +3258,27 @@ out:
> > return co.ret;
> > }
> >
> > +int bdrv_co_zone_report(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
> > + int64_t len, int64_t *nr_zones,
> > + BlockZoneDescriptor *zones)
> > +{
> > + if (!bs->drv->bdrv_co_zone_report) {
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
>
> ENOTSUP or EOPNOTSUP?
> Kevin?
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + return bs->drv->bdrv_co_zone_report(bs, offset, len, nr_zones, zones);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int bdrv_co_zone_mgmt(BlockDriverState *bs, enum zone_op op,
> > + int64_t offset, int64_t len)
> > +{
> > + if (!bs->drv->bdrv_co_zone_mgmt) {
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return bs->drv->bdrv_co_zone_mgmt(bs, op, offset, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > void *qemu_blockalign(BlockDriverState *bs, size_t size)
> > {
> > IO_CODE();
> > diff --git a/include/block/block-io.h b/include/block/block-io.h
> > index 62c84f0519..c85c174579 100644
> > --- a/include/block/block-io.h
> > +++ b/include/block/block-io.h
> > @@ -80,6 +80,13 @@ int bdrv_co_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs, int req, void
> > *buf);
> > /* Ensure contents are flushed to disk. */
> > int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_flush(BlockDriverState *bs);
> >
> > +/* Report zone information of zone block device. */
> > +int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_zone_report(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
> > + int64_t len, int64_t *nr_zones,
> > + BlockZoneDescriptor *zones);
> > +int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_zone_mgmt(BlockDriverState *bs, zone_op op,
> > + int64_t offset, int64_t len);
> > +
>
> There's the thing with the intendation ... please make it consistent,
> and ideally follow with whatever the remaining prototypes do.
>
> > int bdrv_co_pdiscard(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes);
> > bool bdrv_can_write_zeroes_with_unmap(BlockDriverState *bs);
> > int bdrv_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
> > @@ -290,6 +297,12 @@ bdrv_readv_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector
> > *qiov, int64_t pos);
> > int generated_co_wrapper
> > bdrv_writev_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int64_t
> > pos);
> >
> > +int generated_co_wrapper blk_zone_report(BlockBackend *blk, int64_t offset,
> > + int64_t len, int64_t *nr_zones,
> > + BlockZoneDescriptor *zones);
> > +int generated_co_wrapper blk_zone_mgmt(BlockBackend *blk, enum zone_op op,
> > + int64_t offset, int64_t len);
> > +
>
> Again here.
>
> > /**
> > * bdrv_parent_drained_begin_single:
> > *
> > diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c
> > index 2f0d8ac25a..3f2592b9f5 100644
> > --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c
> > +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c
> > @@ -1706,6 +1706,122 @@ static const cmdinfo_t flush_cmd = {
> > .oneline = "flush all in-core file state to disk",
> > };
> >
> > +static int zone_report_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + int64_t offset, len, nr_zones;
> > + int i = 0;
> > +
> > + ++optind;
> > + offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > + ++optind;
> > + len = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > + ++optind;
> > + nr_zones = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > +
> And 'optind' is set where?
optind is declared in getopt_core.h.
> Plus do check for 'argv' overflow; before increasing 'optind' and using
> 'argv[optind]' you have to validate that 'argv[optind]' is a valid pointer.
>
Maybe we can check if argc is bigger than what we want?
> > + g_autofree BlockZoneDescriptor *zones = g_new(BlockZoneDescriptor,
> > nr_zones);
> > + ret = blk_zone_report(blk, offset, len, &nr_zones, zones);
> > + while (i < nr_zones) {
> > + fprintf(stdout, "start: 0x%lx, len 0x%lx, cap 0x%lx, wptr 0x%lx, "
> > + "zcond:%u, [type: %u]\n",
> > + zones[i].start, zones[i].length, zones[i].cap, zones[i].wp,
> > + zones[i].cond, zones[i].type);
> > + ++i;
> As 'i' is a simple iterator maybe use a 'for' loop here.
> But that really is a matter of preference :-)
>
Ok!
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const cmdinfo_t zone_report_cmd = {
> > + .name = "zone_report",
> > + .altname = "f",
>
> altname 'f'?
> Is that correct?
>
No, it's not. I misunderstood altname's meaning. Changed it now.
> > + .cfunc = zone_report_f,
> > + .argmin = 3,
> > + .argmax = 3,
> > + .args = "offset [offset..] len [len..] number [num..]",
> > + .oneline = "report a number of zones",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int zone_open_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + int64_t offset, len;
> > + ++optind;
> > + offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > + ++optind;
> > + len = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
>
> Same here: please check for 'argv' overflow.
>
> > + return blk_zone_mgmt(blk, zone_open, offset, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const cmdinfo_t zone_open_cmd = {
> > + .name = "zone_open",
> > + .altname = "f",
>
> Same here; shouldn't 'altname' be different for each function?
> 'zo', maybe?
>
> > + .cfunc = zone_open_f,
> > + .argmin = 2,
> > + .argmax = 2,
> > + .args = "offset [offset..] len [len..]",
> > + .oneline = "explicit open a range of zones in zone block device",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int zone_close_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + int64_t offset, len;
> > + ++optind;
> > + offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > + ++optind;
> > + len = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
>
> argv checking.
>
> > + return blk_zone_mgmt(blk, zone_close, offset, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const cmdinfo_t zone_close_cmd = {
> > + .name = "zone_close",
> > + .altname = "f",
>
> altname 'zc'
>
> > + .cfunc = zone_close_f,
> > + .argmin = 2,
> > + .argmax = 2,
> > + .args = "offset [offset..] len [len..]",
> > + .oneline = "close a range of zones in zone block device",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int zone_finish_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + int64_t offset, len;
> > + ++optind;
> > + offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > + ++optind;
> > + len = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
>
> Argv checking.
>
> > + return blk_zone_mgmt(blk, zone_finish, offset, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const cmdinfo_t zone_finish_cmd = {
> > + .name = "zone_finish",
> > + .altname = "f",
>
> altname 'zf'
>
> > + .cfunc = zone_finish_f,
> > + .argmin = 2,
> > + .argmax = 2,
> > + .args = "offset [offset..] len [len..]",
> > + .oneline = "finish a range of zones in zone block device",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int zone_reset_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + int64_t offset, len;
> > + ++optind;
> > + offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
> > + ++optind;
> > + len = cvtnum(argv[optind]);
>
> Argv checking.
>
> > + return blk_zone_mgmt(blk, zone_reset, offset, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const cmdinfo_t zone_reset_cmd = {
> > + .name = "zone_reset",
> > + .altname = "f",
>
> altname 'zf'
>
> > + .cfunc = zone_reset_f, > + .argmin = 2,
> > + .argmax = 2,
> > + .args = "offset [offset..] len [len..]",
> > + .oneline = "reset a zone write pointer in zone block device",
> > +};
> > +
> > +
> > static int truncate_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv);
> > static const cmdinfo_t truncate_cmd = {
> > .name = "truncate",
> > @@ -2498,6 +2614,11 @@ static void __attribute((constructor))
> > init_qemuio_commands(void)
> > qemuio_add_command(&aio_write_cmd);
> > qemuio_add_command(&aio_flush_cmd);
> > qemuio_add_command(&flush_cmd);
> > + qemuio_add_command(&zone_report_cmd);
> > + qemuio_add_command(&zone_open_cmd);
> > + qemuio_add_command(&zone_close_cmd);
> > + qemuio_add_command(&zone_finish_cmd);
> > + qemuio_add_command(&zone_reset_cmd);
> > qemuio_add_command(&truncate_cmd);
> > qemuio_add_command(&length_cmd);
> > qemuio_add_command(&info_cmd);
>
> Otherwise looks okay.
>
Thanks!
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
> --
> Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
> hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
[RFC v3 2/5] qemu-io: add zoned block device operations., Sam Li, 2022/06/26
[RFC v3 3/5] file-posix: introduce get_sysfs_long_val for zoned device information., Sam Li, 2022/06/26
[RFC v3 4/5] file-posix: introduce get_sysfs_str_val for device zoned model., Sam Li, 2022/06/26