qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] vhost-user-blk: dynamically resize config space based


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] vhost-user-blk: dynamically resize config space based on features
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:28:31 -0400

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:18:37PM +0300, Daniil Tatianin wrote:
> Make vhost-user-blk backwards compatible when migrating from older VMs
> running with modern features turned off, the same way it was done for
> virtio-blk in 20764be0421c ("virtio-blk: set config size depending on the 
> features enabled")
> 
> It's currently impossible to migrate from an older VM with
> vhost-user-blk (with disable-legacy=off) because of errors like this:
> 
> qemu-system-x86_64: get_pci_config_device: Bad config data: i=0x10 read: 41 
> device: 1 cmask: ff wmask: 80 w1cmask:0
> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed to load PCIDevice:config
> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed to load virtio-blk:virtio
> qemu-system-x86_64: error while loading state for instance 0x0 of device 
> '0000:00:05.0:00.0:02.0/virtio-blk'
> qemu-system-x86_64: load of migration failed: Invalid argument
> 
> This is caused by the newer (destination) VM requiring a bigger BAR0
> alignment because it has to cover a bigger configuration space, which
> isn't actually needed since those additional config fields are not
> active (write-zeroes/discard).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniil Tatianin <d-tatianin@yandex-team.ru>
> ---
>  hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c          | 15 ++++++++-------
>  include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
> index 64f3457373..d18a7a2cd4 100644
> --- a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include "hw/qdev-core.h"
>  #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>  #include "hw/qdev-properties-system.h"
> +#include "hw/virtio/virtio-blk-common.h"
>  #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
>  #include "hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk.h"
>  #include "hw/virtio/virtio.h"
> @@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ static void vhost_user_blk_update_config(VirtIODevice 
> *vdev, uint8_t *config)
>      /* Our num_queues overrides the device backend */
>      virtio_stw_p(vdev, &s->blkcfg.num_queues, s->num_queues);
>  
> -    memcpy(config, &s->blkcfg, sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config));
> +    memcpy(config, &s->blkcfg, s->config_size);

Please drop the s->config_size field introduced in this patch and use
vdev->config_len instead. When the same value is stored in multiple
places it's hard to be sure each copy remains identical and bugs can
creep in.

For example, if vdev->config_len is used consistently then it's clear
that buffer overflows and information leaks are prevented by common
code:

  uint32_t virtio_config_readb(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint32_t addr)
  {
      VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
      uint8_t val;

      if (addr + sizeof(val) > vdev->config_len) {
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          return (uint32_t)-1;
      }

      k->get_config(vdev, vdev->config);

It's safe because vdev->config is g_malloc0(vdev->config_len).

Buf if I see s->config_size, I don't really know whether it's safe and I
need to audit the code to be sure.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]