Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] block: add block layer APIs resembling Linux ZonedBlockDevice ioctls

[Klaus Jensen]

On Sep 10 13:27, Sam Li wrote:
> Add a new zoned_host_device BlockDriver. The zoned_host_device option
> accepts only zoned host block devices. By adding zone management
> operations in this new BlockDriver, users can use the new block
> layer APIs including Report Zone and four zone management operations
> (open, close, finish, reset).
> 
> Qemu-io uses the new APIs to perform zoned storage commands of the device:
> zone_report(zrp), zone_open(zo), zone_close(zc), zone_reset(zrs),
> zone_finish(zf).
> 
> For example, to test zone_report, use following command:
> $ ./build/qemu-io --image-opts -n driver=zoned_host_device, 
> filename=/dev/nullb0
> -c "zrp offset nr_zones"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  block/block-backend.c             | 145 ++++++++++++++
>  block/file-posix.c                | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  block/io.c                        |  41 ++++
>  include/block/block-io.h          |   7 +
>  include/block/block_int-common.h  |  21 ++
>  include/block/raw-aio.h           |   6 +-
>  include/sysemu/block-backend-io.h |  17 ++
>  meson.build                       |   1 +
>  qapi/block-core.json              |   8 +-
>  qemu-io-cmds.c                    | 143 +++++++++++++
>  10 files changed, 708 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> +/*
> + * zone management operations - Execute an operation on a zone
> + */
> +static int coroutine_fn raw_co_zone_mgmt(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockZoneOp 
> op,
> +        int64_t offset, int64_t len) {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_BLKZONED)
> +    BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> +    RawPosixAIOData acb;
> +    int64_t zone_sector, zone_sector_mask;
> +    const char *zone_op_name;
> +    unsigned long zone_op;
> +    bool is_all = false;
> +
> +    zone_sector = bs->bl.zone_sectors;
> +    zone_sector_mask = zone_sector - 1;
> +    if (offset & zone_sector_mask) {
> +        error_report("sector offset %" PRId64 " is not aligned to zone size "
> +                     "%" PRId64 "", offset, zone_sector);
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (len & zone_sector_mask) {
> +        error_report("number of sectors %" PRId64 " is not aligned to zone 
> size"
> +                      " %" PRId64 "", len, zone_sector);
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    }

These checks impose a power-of-two constraint on the zone size. Can they
be changed to divisions to lift that constraint? I don't see anything in
this patch set that relies on power of two zone sizes.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature