qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] ppc/e500: Add support for two types of flash, clean


From: Bernhard Beschow
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] ppc/e500: Add support for two types of flash, cleanup
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 16:11:14 +0000

Am 4. Oktober 2022 12:43:35 UTC schrieb Daniel Henrique Barboza 
<danielhb413@gmail.com>:
>Hey,
>
>On 10/3/22 18:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> 
>> On 3/10/22 22:31, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>>> Cover letter:
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> 
>>> This series adds support for -pflash and direct SD card access to the
>>> PPC e500 boards. The idea is to increase compatibility with "real" firmware
>>> images where only the bare minimum of drivers is compiled in.
>> 
>>> Bernhard Beschow (13):
>>>    hw/ppc/meson: Allow e500 boards to be enabled separately
>>>    hw/gpio/meson: Introduce dedicated config switch for hw/gpio/mpc8xxx
>>>    docs/system/ppc/ppce500: Add heading for networking chapter
>>>    hw/ppc/e500: Reduce usage of sysbus API
>>>    hw/ppc/mpc8544ds: Rename wrongly named method
>>>    hw/ppc/mpc8544ds: Add platform bus
>>>    hw/ppc/e500: Remove if statement which is now always true
>> 
>> This first part is mostly reviewed and can already go via your
>> ppc-next queue.
>
>We're missing an ACK in patch 6/13:
>
>hw/ppc/mpc8544ds: Add platform bus

Bin: Ping?

Best regards,
Bernhard
>
>I'll need some time to understand what's been doing there to provide my own
>R-b. Or you can toss a R-b there :D
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Daniel
>
>
>
>> 
>>>    hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Error out if device length isn't a power of two
>>>    hw/ppc/e500: Implement pflash handling
>>>    hw/sd/sdhci-internal: Unexport ESDHC defines
>>>    hw/sd/sdhci: Rename ESDHC_* defines to USDHC_*
>>>    hw/sd/sdhci: Implement Freescale eSDHC device model
>>>    hw/ppc/e500: Add Freescale eSDHC to e500 boards
>> 
>> This second part still need work. I can take it via the sdmmc-next
>> queue.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Phil.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]