[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] hw/vfio/pci: Omit errp for pci_add_capability
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] hw/vfio/pci: Omit errp for pci_add_capability |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:10:15 -0600 |
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 05:15:25 +0900
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> wrote:
> The code generating errors in pci_add_capability has a comment which
> says:
> > Verify that capabilities don't overlap. Note: device assignment
> > depends on this check to verify that the device is not broken.
> > Should never trigger for emulated devices, but it's helpful for
> > debugging these.
>
> Indeed vfio has some code that passes capability offsets and sizes from
> a physical device, but it explicitly pays attention so that the
> capabilities never overlap. Therefore, in pci_add_capability(), we can
> always assert that capabilities never overlap, and that is what happens
> when omitting errp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c | 15 +++------------
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 14 +++++---------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c b/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c
> index f0147a050a..e94fd273ea 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c
> @@ -1530,7 +1530,7 @@ const PropertyInfo qdev_prop_nv_gpudirect_clique = {
> static int vfio_add_nv_gpudirect_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> {
> PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
> - int ret, pos = 0xC8;
> + int pos = 0xC8;
>
> if (vdev->nv_gpudirect_clique == 0xFF) {
> return 0;
> @@ -1547,11 +1547,7 @@ static int vfio_add_nv_gpudirect_cap(VFIOPCIDevice
> *vdev, Error **errp)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - ret = pci_add_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR, pos, 8, errp);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - error_prepend(errp, "Failed to add NVIDIA GPUDirect cap: ");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + pci_add_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR, pos, 8);
>
> memset(vdev->emulated_config_bits + pos, 0xFF, 8);
> pos += PCI_CAP_FLAGS;
> @@ -1718,12 +1714,7 @@ static int vfio_add_vmd_shadow_cap(VFIOPCIDevice
> *vdev, Error **errp)
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> - ret = pci_add_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR, pos,
> - VMD_SHADOW_CAP_LEN, errp);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - error_prepend(errp, "Failed to add VMD MEMBAR Shadow cap: ");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + pci_add_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR, pos,
> VMD_SHADOW_CAP_LEN);
For these, I guess we're assuming that since they're added first via
vfio_add_virt_caps() that we cannot create an overlap?
>
> memset(vdev->emulated_config_bits + pos, 0xFF, VMD_SHADOW_CAP_LEN);
> pos += PCI_CAP_FLAGS;
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 939dcc3d4a..2b653d01e3 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ static void vfio_add_emulated_long(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
> int pos,
> vfio_set_long_bits(vdev->emulated_config_bits + pos, mask, mask);
> }
>
> -static int vfio_setup_pcie_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, int pos, uint8_t size,
> +static int vfio_setup_pcie_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, uint8_t pos, uint8_t
> size,
> Error **errp)
> {
> uint16_t flags;
> @@ -1943,11 +1943,7 @@ static int vfio_setup_pcie_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
> int pos, uint8_t size,
> 1, PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS);
> }
>
> - pos = pci_add_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, pos, size,
> - errp);
> - if (pos < 0) {
> - return pos;
> - }
> + pos = pci_add_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, pos, size);
>
> vdev->pdev.exp.exp_cap = pos;
>
> @@ -2045,14 +2041,14 @@ static int vfio_add_std_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
> uint8_t pos, Error **errp)
> case PCI_CAP_ID_PM:
> vfio_check_pm_reset(vdev, pos);
> vdev->pm_cap = pos;
> - ret = pci_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, pos, size, errp);
> + pci_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, pos, size);
> break;
> case PCI_CAP_ID_AF:
> vfio_check_af_flr(vdev, pos);
> - ret = pci_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, pos, size, errp);
> + pci_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, pos, size);
> break;
> default:
> - ret = pci_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, pos, size, errp);
> + pci_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, pos, size);
> break;
> }
And for these we've calculated a size to make sure that we don't bump
into the next capability, but how do you account for the MSI and MSI-X
cases above this chunk where vfio's overlap prevention can't be used?
Thanks,
Alex
- [PATCH v3 04/16] e1000e: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, (continued)
- [PATCH v3 04/16] e1000e: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 07/16] msi: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 06/16] hw/nvme: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 11/16] msix: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 13/16] hw/pci-bridge/pcie_pci_bridge: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 09/16] pcie: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 10/16] pci/shpc: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 12/16] pci/slotid: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 08/16] hw/pci/pci_bridge: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 14/16] hw/vfio/pci: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] hw/vfio/pci: Omit errp for pci_add_capability,
Alex Williamson <=
- [PATCH v3 15/16] virtio-pci: Omit errp for pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26
- [PATCH v3 16/16] pci: Remove legacy errp from pci_add_capability, Akihiko Odaki, 2022/10/26