[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] block/file-posix: don't use functions calling AIO_WAIT_WHILE in
From: |
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito |
Subject: |
[PATCH] block/file-posix: don't use functions calling AIO_WAIT_WHILE in worker threads |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 2023 10:45:22 -0500 |
When calling bdrv_getlength() in handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(), the
function creates a new coroutine and then waits that it finishes using
AIO_WAIT_WHILE.
The problem is that this function could also run in a worker thread,
that has a different AioContext from main loop and iothreads, therefore
in AIO_WAIT_WHILE we will have in_aio_context_home_thread(ctx) == false
and therefore
assert(qemu_get_current_aio_context() == qemu_get_aio_context());
in the else branch will fail, crashing QEMU.
Aside from that, bdrv_getlength() is wrong also conceptually, because
it reads the BDS graph from another thread and is not protected by
any lock.
Replace it with raw_co_getlength, that doesn't create a coroutine and
doesn't read the BDS graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
block/file-posix.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index d3073a7caa..9a99111f45 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ static int handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(void *opaque)
#ifdef CONFIG_FALLOCATE
/* Last resort: we are trying to extend the file with zeroed data. This
* can be done via fallocate(fd, 0) */
- len = bdrv_getlength(aiocb->bs);
+ len = raw_co_getlength(aiocb->bs);
if (s->has_fallocate && len >= 0 && aiocb->aio_offset >= len) {
int ret = do_fallocate(s->fd, 0, aiocb->aio_offset, aiocb->aio_nbytes);
if (ret == 0 || ret != -ENOTSUP) {
--
2.39.1
- [PATCH] block/file-posix: don't use functions calling AIO_WAIT_WHILE in worker threads,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <=