qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v3 2/3] dma-helpers: prevent dma_blk_cb() vs dma_aio_cancel() rac


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] dma-helpers: prevent dma_blk_cb() vs dma_aio_cancel() race
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:22:17 -0500

dma_blk_cb() only takes the AioContext lock around ->io_func(). That
means the rest of dma_blk_cb() is not protected. In particular, the
DMAAIOCB field accesses happen outside the lock.

There is a race when the main loop thread holds the AioContext lock and
invokes scsi_device_purge_requests() -> bdrv_aio_cancel() ->
dma_aio_cancel() while an IOThread executes dma_blk_cb(). The dbs->acb
field determines how cancellation proceeds. If dma_aio_cancel() sees
dbs->acb == NULL while dma_blk_cb() is still running, the request can be
completed twice (-ECANCELED and the actual return value).

The following assertion can occur with virtio-scsi when an IOThread is
used:

  ../hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c:368: scsi_dma_complete: Assertion `r->req.aiocb != 
NULL' failed.

Fix the race by holding the AioContext across dma_blk_cb(). Now
dma_aio_cancel() under the AioContext lock will not see
inconsistent/intermediate states.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c   |  4 +---
 softmmu/dma-helpers.c | 12 +++++++-----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
index 115584f8b9..97c9b1c8cd 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
@@ -354,13 +354,12 @@ done:
     scsi_req_unref(&r->req);
 }
 
+/* Called with AioContext lock held */
 static void scsi_dma_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
 {
     SCSIDiskReq *r = (SCSIDiskReq *)opaque;
     SCSIDiskState *s = DO_UPCAST(SCSIDiskState, qdev, r->req.dev);
 
-    aio_context_acquire(blk_get_aio_context(s->qdev.conf.blk));
-
     assert(r->req.aiocb != NULL);
     r->req.aiocb = NULL;
 
@@ -370,7 +369,6 @@ static void scsi_dma_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
         block_acct_done(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), &r->acct);
     }
     scsi_dma_complete_noio(r, ret);
-    aio_context_release(blk_get_aio_context(s->qdev.conf.blk));
 }
 
 static void scsi_read_complete_noio(SCSIDiskReq *r, int ret)
diff --git a/softmmu/dma-helpers.c b/softmmu/dma-helpers.c
index 7820fec54c..2463964805 100644
--- a/softmmu/dma-helpers.c
+++ b/softmmu/dma-helpers.c
@@ -113,17 +113,19 @@ static void dma_complete(DMAAIOCB *dbs, int ret)
 static void dma_blk_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
 {
     DMAAIOCB *dbs = (DMAAIOCB *)opaque;
+    AioContext *ctx = dbs->ctx;
     dma_addr_t cur_addr, cur_len;
     void *mem;
 
     trace_dma_blk_cb(dbs, ret);
 
+    aio_context_acquire(ctx);
     dbs->acb = NULL;
     dbs->offset += dbs->iov.size;
 
     if (dbs->sg_cur_index == dbs->sg->nsg || ret < 0) {
         dma_complete(dbs, ret);
-        return;
+        goto out;
     }
     dma_blk_unmap(dbs);
 
@@ -164,9 +166,9 @@ static void dma_blk_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
 
     if (dbs->iov.size == 0) {
         trace_dma_map_wait(dbs);
-        dbs->bh = aio_bh_new(dbs->ctx, reschedule_dma, dbs);
+        dbs->bh = aio_bh_new(ctx, reschedule_dma, dbs);
         cpu_register_map_client(dbs->bh);
-        return;
+        goto out;
     }
 
     if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(dbs->iov.size, dbs->align)) {
@@ -174,11 +176,11 @@ static void dma_blk_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
                                 QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(dbs->iov.size, dbs->align));
     }
 
-    aio_context_acquire(dbs->ctx);
     dbs->acb = dbs->io_func(dbs->offset, &dbs->iov,
                             dma_blk_cb, dbs, dbs->io_func_opaque);
-    aio_context_release(dbs->ctx);
     assert(dbs->acb);
+out:
+    aio_context_release(ctx);
 }
 
 static void dma_aio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *acb)
-- 
2.39.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]